Become a Member!
Become an ANH Pathfinder today and help us co-create new health systems that respect nature as well as human rights and freedoms!
YouTube channel
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel to become part of a growing community of Health Creators
22 July 2003
The UK national media seemed to be disinterested in the fiasco surrounding the transposition of the EU Food Supplements Directive into English law. However, one of the top regional newspapers has picked up the gauntlet and finally given coverage to these important issues. Read on
21 July 2003
Read below Rachel Andrews report about the proposed challenge against the EU Food Supplements Directive being developed by the pan-European and international Alliance for Natural Health.
20 July 2003
Felicity Kendal from the UK's Daily Telegraph speaks out on contradictions and poor rationale in government policy on such diverse things as police patrols, mobile phones, junk food and..... nutritional supplements.
18 July 2003
Pressure by the UK and EU governments to limit the maximum allowed dosage of vitamin B6 continues, despite good evidence that doses at least 10 times greater than the upper safe level recommended by the UK's Food Standards Agency are safe.
17 July 2003
Is the simultaneous release of the perceived need by the US government and EU Commission to enforce very restrictive health claims regulations in the USA and European Union a mere coincidence - or is it part of bigger plan?
14 July 2003
Although many have made claims to this effect, the evidence from authoritative sources has often been wanting. Now an internal UK government dossier obtained by the UK Observer newspaper has revealed the truth.
11 July 2003
Read the inside story showing how Herculean efforts by MPs, Lords, the Alliance for Natural Health and other lobbies, was not enough to resist the transposition of the EU Food Supplements Directive in to English law. A legal challenge of the directive is now the only feasible route to health freedom.
11 July 2003
Read on for Part 2 (Postscript and Summary) of Paul Anthony Taylor's report. This is the story the newspapers didn't publish.
07 July 2003
Kate Hoey, Labour MP made her opinions known and was removed from the standing committee voting on the transposition of the EU Food Supplements Directive. Up to 5 Labour MPs on the committee were replaced the day before the vote. With the re-worked committee, the regulations gained support by two votes.
30 June 2003
Key Euro MEPs John Bowis, Theresa Villiers and Dr Charles Tannock indicate their opposition to the EU Food Supplements Directive in a Letter to the Editor published in the Daily Telegraph on 30 June 2003.
30 June 2003
Many Americans were breathing easy after the victory with the the Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act of 1994. Then came Senate Bill S.722. Read what NOW Foods are saying about it. Let's all recognise the global nature of the threat to innovative, effective dietary supplements. This is a call to action!
20 June 2003
The second largest formulator of dietary supplements in the world feels the pain globally, after its license was suspended in Australia in late April. It is widely felt in industry circles that this suspension was overly harsh, particularly considering that the quality control problems that initiated the ban were primarily confined to a pharmaceutical product, rather than natural healthcare pro
12 June 2003
The two major trade associations representing concerns in Ireland about the restrictive effects the EU Food Supplements Directive presented their case to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health in Dublin on 12 June 2003.
07 June 2003
In an Exclusive in the UK Daily Mirror newspaper, suggestive evidence is revealed for possible political spin associated with the FSA report on Upper Safe Levels of vitamins and minerals, released on 8 May 2003.
23 May 2003
Read on to see what the Ecologist has to say about the EU Directives.....
19 May 2003
NHS Direct Online has released its opinion of the FSA report and criticises in particular inaccuracies in the media reporting. It also stresses no systematic review methodology was used therefore it is "not possible to decide how reliable the conclusions might be."
This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our products and services, and provide content from third parties.
