Schwarzenegger Attacks "Quackbusters"...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Saturday, October 30th, 2004
The "quackbuster" operation, run out of a New York ad agency, isn't doing well in California... to say the least.
Many of my readers will remember, with amusement, the pieces I wrote about the "quackbusters" being humiliated in California when they sued over forty victims, using California Business & Professions Code 17200. The NCAHF v. King Bio case was a classic. It was there that top quackbusters Stephen Barrett and Wallace Sampson were declared in a three Judge Appeals court decision to be "biased, and unworthy of credibility."
Neither can we forget that it was, in another of those cases, that the NCAHF was ordered to pay over $100,000 in legal fees to one of their victims - and they haven't paid it yet. It was during that period that the NCAHF's top attorney, Morse Mehrban, declared "I consider suicide daily..."
And, it isn't over for the quackbusters...
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has joined several citizen's groups in taking a formal stand against certain sleazy "quackbuster" activities. The Governor, along with a citizen's group, "Californians to Stop Shakedown Lawsuits (CSSL), is promoting California ballot Proposition #64, described by Schwarzenegger to accomplish the following:
""Proposition 64 will stop the legal practice of shakedown lawsuits, in which private lawyers file suits without any client or any evidence of harm. This turns lawyers into bounty hunters, stalking innocent small businesses that create jobs and opportunity in California." Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger."
The "quackbuster's" flagship, the self-styled National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), just a few years ago,
stalked, and sued, over forty innocent victims in California using the "shakedown" lawsuit principal. According to delicensed MD Stephen Barrett, the NCAHF's Vice President brags "NCAHF sued about 40 defendants, and I have also been involved as a consultant or expert witness in similar cases filed by other parties. Overall, at least ten have been settled..."
The San Diego Union-Tribune says of the "quackbuster's" attempted shakedown:
"Proposition 64 would lower the cost of doing business in California by making much needed changes in Section 17200 of the state's Business and Professions Code, the so-called unfair competition law. The often misused law allows any person, claiming to act on the public's behalf, to haul a business into court alleging an unlawful or fraudulent act
Comments
your voice counts
There are currently no comments on this post.
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences