The Cancer Act 1939 makes it illegal to advertise any kind of cancer treatment in the UK. While non-orthodox practitioners cannot advertise to potential patients, it is, however, still legal to discuss non-orthodox treatments – as it clearly should be in any country that claims a vestige of free speech! If the recent experiences of the Totnes Cancer Health Care Conference (TCHCC) are anything to go by, however, UK authorities – cheered on by anti-natural health skeptics – would like to change all that.
The Conference and the role of Trading Standards
The TCHCC was set up by Dr Stephen Hopwood, who runs the Arcturus Clinic and Totnes Cancer Help Centre, as a forum for international experts – including Rob Verkerk of ANH-Intl – to discuss, “The idea that if our body’s immune and endocrine systems are correctly functioning, well supported and balanced physiologically then cancer is less likely to arise”.
When a conference such as the TCHCC is scheduled, the UK authorities in the form of the Trading Standards Institute has the power to cancel the event if it is seen to be breaking the law – such as by promoting cancer treatments to the public. On Tuesday 20th March, the TCHCC organisers were informed that Trading Standards officers were investigating the conference, prompted by a local Member of Parliament (MP) – also a medical practitioner – who was particularly concerned about one speaker, Dr Tullio Simoncini. Dr Simoncini is well known for his controversial view that cancer is a fungus that can be treated using sodium bicarbonate, which remains a fringe position even in non-orthodox cancer thought. That of course doesn’t make it unworthy of discussion. We would have been interested to find out, for example, what molecular evidence Dr Simoncini had for his theory that cancer cells are actually fungal cells. Can all those years of research on oncogenesis be wrong? Highly unlikely we would say.
Cancellation demanded
In a letter that Dr Hopwood sent to the TCHCC speakers on 21st March, Dr Hopwood revealed that he had spoken to a Trading Standards officer on the 20th, and had removed certain material from his website following the officer’s guidance that it included cancer treatment recommendations. Bizarrely, one of the frowned-upon items was a link to a story about turmeric on the BBC News website!
Dr Hopwood also took the decision to remove Dr Simoncini from the Conference lineup. These changes made, he informed Trading Standards and was told to expect a swift decision on whether the event was now compliant with legislation.
Beyond the Cancer Act 1939
More than 48 hours later, on the morning of Friday 23rd March, Dr Hopwood finally received an official decision from Trading Standards. “Unless it is part of a notice between certain classes of profession, such as registered medical practitioners,” read the letter, “The Cancer Act 1939 creates a criminal offence to take any part in the publication of any advertisement [for cancer treatment]. Your website and the conference itself does not fall into any of these exempt categories.” In an even wider interpretation of the Cancer Act 1939, the officer continued, “Even the title of the conference and the title of your clinic, in our view, are likely to breach the legislation because of their promotion of cancer treatment.” So now the word ‘cancer’ next to the words ‘help’, ‘health’ or ‘care’ is seemingly illegal? The mind boggles.
Courage in adversity
Dr Hopwood has elected not to cave in response to Trading Standards. In his response, he points out that, “We are not promoting any therapy for the prevention or treatment of cancer...we are administering a range of healthcare modalities that are known to help support the body in a diseased state, particularly when affected by cancer.” Furthermore, “There was never intended to be any goods or services sold or advertised at the conference. Additionally no advice was intended to be given that related to the treatment of cancer...The conference itself represents merely an exchange of information and views, albeit related to the theme of cancer.”
Friday 23rd March is the first time that anything has been received in writing about the conference itself breaching the Cancer Act of 1939, despite the lack of any goods and services being advertised, promoted or sold there for the treatment of cancer. It was intended to be convened purely for educational purposes as an exchange of views and information relating to the theme of cancer, amongst other general health discussions. It appears that further bullyboy tactics on the part of the Council and threats of arrests and prosecutions have been employed through the day today. As a result, whilst the Totnes Cancer Health Care Conference may not be able to be run in the original form, a ‘private conversation’ for invited guests will take place at a private location, namely the Eden Rise, just outside of Totnes.
If you would like to take part in that conversation, please telephone The Arcturus Clinic on 01803 868282 for an invitation or email [email protected]. Anyone in the south-west of the UK, or beyond, with an interest in cancer or the freedom to discuss alternative theories without hassle from the authorities should get along and show their support. As Dr Hopwood says in his response to Trading Standards, “Your declaration of the conference itself as a breach of the Cancer Act imposes an infringement on freedom of speech.”
More than ever before, advocates of health practices that look beyond the mainstream need to organise, both proactively and reactively, to defend their rights and freedoms.
Comments
your voice counts
Norman
23 March 2012 at 9:47 pm
This is an outrage !
The whole of the sick care industry in this country is a scam.
Cancer being the biggest, and diabetes and heart disease not far behind. All supported by politicians who are in the pockets of big pharma.
I remember when this country was democratic, but that was a long time ago now.
kibitzer http://kibitzer-truthseeker.blogspot.com
23 March 2012 at 11:22 pm
The public simply must not let TPTB win the battle regarding the free speech right to information regarding either alternative approaches to the treatment of cancer or immune enhancement. if the 1939 Cancer Act is going to be used in a way that says that purely providing information about alternative approaches to cancer treatment, and theories regarding such, is an incitement TO such treatment, and is a product-selling 'front', then it has to go, and that's where energy needs to be directed to.
The medical-pharmaceutical-government complex is growing too strong. It must be cut down to manageable size. It has a voice. And, it should NOT have a monopoiy on public information and awareness.
Anonymous
25 March 2012 at 11:00 am
Thank you to all those who spoke about the cultivation of health, energy, wellbeing and strong immunity near Totnes on Saturday 24 March 2012.
Food is important! Natural medicine has an important and value-for-money role to play as part of integrated medicine in promoting the health of the nation. NHS could save money.
You were and are right to speak (and if you're right then never fear...)
Andy Lewis http://www.quackometer.net
26 March 2012 at 10:44 am
I have been critical of the organisers for holding this event. The Express was also very critical of it on Sunday. But I see no mention of the issues raised.
Robert V, perhaps you would like to tell us your views on what ethical considerations participants and organisers should make when looking at the content and speakers in such a public cancer event?
stephen palmer
08 April 2012 at 3:04 pm
I love these stories. It is so important that events like this are publicised. The big newspapers, television and radio do not publish stories like this, and if they are forced to, they do not tell the whole storey. We have to wake up. This kind of thing happens every day, and we refuse to acknowledge the fact. We don't hear about it through the press, but once we start to look for more alternative news, we begin to realise that we are living in a very messed up world. It is much easier to close ones ears and close ones eyes and pretend that the world is fair and just, but it doesn't help anybody. Help us wake up!!
Oliver Slay
14 April 2012 at 7:43 pm
On baking soda therapy... If there is nothing in it then why has the NIH in the US given a $2 million grant to the University of Arizona to research baking soda and breast cancer? The researchers are investigating the acidity of tumour tissues:
http://engr.arizona.edu/news/story.php?id=429
So.. perhaps Dr Simoncini was on the right path and asking some interesting questions, questions that others apparently are continuing to ask. Baking soda apparently also alters the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
"There is outstanding evidence that baking soda treatments reduce tumor growth and eliminate metastases, but the evidence is limited to mice,” said Mark Pagel, associate professor of biomedical engineering at Arizona.
The conference perhaps could be re-framed as a Cancer Awareness Campaign - under the DAC Guidelines of the MHRA - disseminating information about diseases to the public... guidelines are here:
http://ec.europa.eu/health-eu/doc/cancercode_en.pdf
Finally, turmeric...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19368804
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989768
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299897
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12680238 - "enormous potential"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18496811
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448598 "overwhelming evidence"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18655004
really.. need I go on?
Attorney http://www.elawsuit.com/attorney
10 May 2012 at 11:56 am
As long as healthcare and capitalism are so intimately intertwined, these problems will continue to exist without end and only expansion.
Rosemary Anne
23 November 2012 at 2:17 pm
I am appalled that any discussion about possible cancer treatments should be halted! Do the authorities think that everyone is completely unable to think for themselves?
It is apparently quite OK for a medical doctor to tell a patient that nothing can be done about their illness (any illness) when that is often patently untrue if they were to look for alternative remedies but not OK for there to be a discussion and presentation of alternative ideas which, if heard at a conference, may well provoke other ideas previously unthought of.
As cancer is one of our biggest killers one would have thought that any and all ideas should be considered, surely! Although, if a simple cure were to be found it would do many doctors and pharmaceutical companies out of money.
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences