Content Sections
Internet forums, comment sections and social media are heavily ‘policed’ by those pushing certain agendas – from pharmaceutical companies to governments. Here’s a few pointers to look out for the next time you’re in the thick of keyboard-based battle!
Double-edged sword
Wonderful thing, the Internet: not only the greatest store of human knowledge ever created, but a great leveller that allows everyone to have their say on anything under the sun. Under pressure from an army of concerned individuals, bloggers, citizen journalists, pressure groups and other networks, the previously hidden agendas of governments and big business are being questioned and exposed as never before. With the rise of online conversations in Internet forums and comment sections, new ideas and information spread like wildfire, crossing and re-crossing the world in a matter of milliseconds.
At least, that’s the theory. Whether or not the Internet is actually a great leveller and expander of horizons is certainly arguable, as is the bloggers’ effect on the powers that be – and not just in China. While publications like The Economist would have us believe that, “Arm[ies] of cyber-police, hardware engineers, software developers, web monitors and paid online propagandists,” are employed to, “Watch, filter, censor and guide,” Internet users only in authoritarian dystopias, the truth is that the same things are happening elsewhere. In fact, if you’ve spent a significant amount of time on Internet forums, you’ve probably come across “paid online propagandists” without knowing it.
Down the rabbit hole
That such paid propagandists exist is only common sense. If you’re an organisation with an agenda to push, such as a government or a corporation, one of the most effective ways to do so in the Internet age is to hire people to join discussions and steer them in a particular direction. Even the fusty old European Union (EU) plans on influencing the run-up to the 2014 European elections in this manner. The US military has gone public over software that allows staff to control multiple online personalities, in various worldwide locations – and its assurances that US communications would not be targeted must be taken with a large pinch of salt. The Israeli government’s hasbara programme is one of the most visible ‘online media management’ campaigns. Combine all this with the enormous – and growing – level of online surveillance and data storage performed by Western governments, and perhaps China isn’t the only place where the Internet is becoming a ‘surveillance state’.
Don’t feed the trolls
So what does all this have to do with natural healthcare? Next time you’re on a forum discussing a controversial topic, such as vaccination, make sure you have ‘The Gentleperson’s Guide To Forum Spies’ in front of you. You may already have come across people who display some or all of the following behaviours:
- Forum sliding: posting multiple times so that a sensitive topic gets pushed down the thread – ‘out of sight, out of mind’
- Consensus cracking: making a post with a very weak premise, then following the post with convincing-looking evidence and disinformation. Uninformed readers are more likely to come round to the original poster’s position
- Topic dilution: making plenty of irrelevant postings to the same thread and distracting other posters from the topic at hand.
And next time you’re involved in a forum debate, see how many of the ’25 rules of disinformation’ you can spot! We suspect it will be quite a few.
Awareness is everything
We’re not for a moment suggesting that all, or even most, forums where natural healthcare is debated are infested with ‘agents’, whether paid or unpaid. But some topics, like vaccination or genetic modification (GM), are so important to corporations and governments that it would be naïve to assume that all posters on such forums have arrived at their positions independently.
As ‘The Gentleperson’s Guide To Forum Spies’ says, “Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled.” That’s uncontrolled as in free – the free exchange of ideas and opinions, untainted by vested interests.
What the Internet is all about, in other words.
Call to action
- Be aware that techniques to direct people’s thinking exist and are being used on forums. Become familiar with the techniques and learn to recognise and deal with them – and don’t forget to alert others on the forum when the techniques are being employed!
Comments
your voice counts
kevin morris http://kevinmorrishomeopath.com
25 April 2013 at 12:12 am
I don't doubt the assertions of this article, nor do I doubt the Alliance of natural Health is rather more professional than many groups attempting to counter the corporate message.
I'm afraid though that what does increasingly concern me regarding forums from various facets of the alternative health 'movement' is that the quality of much of the debate is poor with heavy doses of paranoia and remarkably little by way of strategic thinking.
We have an extremely skilled enemy with massive resources and much of the output from of side seems to be on the level of gesture politics. It is very sad. I guess though we've seen it all before. The counterculture of the late sixties and early seventies eventually disappeared, almost without trace after years of navel gazing and internal bickering.
It would be a shame if that were to happen again.
Anonymous http://www.thisiswhytestimonies.wordpress.com
26 April 2013 at 6:02 pm
This is exactly why we have set this up....http://www.thisiswhytestimonies.wordpress.com
Guy Chapman http://blahg.chapmancentral.co.uk
27 April 2013 at 5:22 pm
The assertion that skeptics are "paid propagandists" is ludicrous. The pharmaceutical industry's paid propagandists are talking to doctors, not the internet community. The only proven example of a paid propagandist I can find is the journalist paid over €40,000 per year by a consortium of German homeopathy manufacturers, to attack Edzard Ernst.
You display a classic bunker mentality. You interpret a call for sound evidence as a brutal attack. You see conspiracies round every corner. You support any number of mutually exclusive "alternatives" while rejecting out of hand pretty much anything that bears the imprimatur of science and evidence.
You don't even understand the problem. The whole of this article mischaracterises the reasons for skepticism and misses your own role in the growth of skeptical activism.
Not that there's any point me telling you this, cognitive dissonance being what it is, but it's very important to remember one thing: in most of the acrimonious debates on the internet, the only people with a vested financial interest in the outcome tend to be the naturopaths. You misperceive your own bias as neutrality, which is why you tend to have your biggest problems on sites such as Wikipedia where neutrality is a core principle.
ANH Admin
29 April 2013 at 5:58 pm
Hi Guy, thanks for your comment. Oddly enough, however, this article wasn’t addressed at skeptics directly – although it certainly applies to some of them. Take a deep breath and read it again.
Guy Chapman http://blahg.chapmancentral.co.uk
27 April 2013 at 6:32 pm
Here's a way you could really help your case.
Give some examples where naturopathy has discarded treatments after investigating their efficacy and finding they do not work, or are harmful.
Kelli
19 May 2013 at 10:39 pm
Theres been a war raged by "internet trolls" disguised as skeptics for some time now. Naturopaths don't even have the financial means to defend themselves against attacks by the supposed skeptics whos whole worldview is threatened by an alternative paradigm. "Skeptical activism" is really a group of people who think that their thinking is the only right thinking.
Katrina
10 June 2013 at 7:25 pm
There are paid pharma trolls and they are organized by third party employers. That way if the troll oversteps their bounds they can claim they have no responsibility for the persons actions. I have participated in this system to earn extra cash. It was during the gulf oil spill. I was hired by a private firm, given a list of talking points, websites and more, signed a contract and that was it. For $25 an hour I was to push the conversation minimizing the ecological impact. The moment my task was clear I quit. I have known several people who are in the Alt-medicine bashing regime. They become converts and their work become a personal war. But big oil was not worth the cost of my soul. They are indefensible.
Pigglywiggly
01 July 2013 at 4:21 am
Craigslist worldwide is crawling with this slime. Literally infested with paid trolls blaming every single racial/ethnic group for every social ill (except for one that could get you fined or even jailed in Europe for doing so).
These trolls operate the software to alert them to certain words, then they use the 'sock puppet' personas to supress any and all dissent from their agenda. I think they call it 'public relations'.
Laurie
17 May 2014 at 11:49 am
If you Google Guy Chapman you will find a blog that is full of typical anti-CAM skeptic propaganda.
If you Google Guerilla Skepticism you will find blogs devoted to getting skeptics to actively participate in editing Wikipedia to reflect a skeptic slant.
For those who are not familiar by now, skeptic organizations are dedicated to promulgating anti-CAM disinformation.
errol http://usually%20post%20on%20you%20tube
16 May 2016 at 4:59 pm
I come up against the drug stooges all the time and have become very good at running them away and making them look like fools. I enjoy matching wits with those idiots. Mostly the ones hired are medical school kids that need some extra cash to get by while they are learning to kill people with drugs.
Smithk777 http://gddedaeceekededd.blogspot.com/
22 May 2016 at 8:04 pm
This kind of game gives a real experience of gddedaeceekededd
visit the up coming internet page http://bbs.cnphotos.net/space-uid-1452820.html
13 December 2018 at 10:52 pm
I quite like reading through an article that can make people think.
Also, thanks for permitting me to comment!
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences