On 12th April 2015 the Australian government took an unprecedented step into the murky underworld of manipulation, coercion and blackmail. Prime Minister Tony Abbott announced the government's intention for the ‘No jab No Play and No Pay’ campaign to come into force from January 2016. In short, parents who object and refuse to vaccinate their children will lose their childcare benefit and rebate payments. From 1st January 2016, the ‘conscientious objector’ option will also be removed as an exemption category. It’s a bold and unconstitutional move that has struck many a chord among Australian parents who support the right to vaccine choice. And shockwaves are beginning to reverberate around the world, striking fear into the hearts of millions of parents worldwide lest the domino effect brings the reality closer to home in other countries.
Tasha David, president of the Australian Vaccination-Skeptics Network, has posted a petition urging the Federal Minister of Social Services, Minister Scott Morrison, to not punish parents with unconstitutional penalties for making an informed choice about their children's health — because all parents deserve to make an uncoerced choice for their child’s welfare. Tasha is especially passionate and informed because out of her 8 children, the first 6 were vaccinated and all have serious health conditions which she relates to vaccines. She chose not to vaccinate the last 2, now aged 5 and 8, and they are healthy and vital, having never been ill or needed antibiotics.
Bronwyn Hancock BSc Cert Nutr
An expert view from ‘the ground’ in Australia
We asked Bronwyn Hancock, author of Vaccination – A Fatal Error and producer of Vaccination: The Hidden Truth for a review of the current situation. Following is her exclusive missive prepared for this eAlert.
The Australian Commonwealth Government of the day is pushing to effectively blackmail parents to vaccinate their children. It seeks to remove the right of freedom for parents to make their own choice of health care for their own children, by denying significant government benefits upon which many struggling families are dependent.
Abuse of power, attempt to ‘foreclose’ upon children’s bodies
The Government is in effect seeking to abuse the financial power or influence that it has over those parents who are in receipt of such benefits, to take ownership of their children’s bodies, just as a bank may foreclose upon a borrower’s home. However, home borrowers have at least freely entered into contract with the bank, entitling the bank to take such action. Australians in receipt of government benefits have never wilfully entered into any contract with the state that might require them to hand over ownership of their or their children’s bodies to the state.
Most vulnerable families may include some with acknowledged vaccine damaged children
Further, and ironically, one of the reasons that many families are in receipt of such benefits, and dependent upon them, is that due to encouragement by the state itself, they have in the past been persuaded to vaccinate and their children have consequently been damaged by those vaccines. The Government itself admits this happens, indeed reports on vaccine adverse events each year, including giving causality assessment ratings of ‘certain’ or ‘probable’ to a significant proportion of the adverse events reported.
Vaccine damage can necessitate costly treatment and/or necessary adaptations, but the financial assistance available for meeting such costs is zero or inadequate.
Naturally, such parents do not want to vaccinate their younger, healthy children.
Exemptions grossly inadequate and breach rights
However, no exemption would be available for almost all such children. The exemptions available would only be where the child already suffers from one or more of a limited number of rare and serious medical conditions, or that the parents/carers follow the Christian Science religion. Not even naturally acquired immunity has been mentioned as an ‘acceptable’ basis for exemption.
The proposed legislation denies the rightful existence or validity of parents’ consciences and/or personal religious views telling them that vaccinating is wrong for their particular children and/or would be offensive to God. Such a failure is in breach of Section 116 of the Constitution guaranteeing the “free exercise of any religion”.
Legislation presumes that state has a monopoly on what health choice is best for all children
The proposed legislation presumes that the state has a monopoly on knowing what is best for all children, as a ‘one size fits all’ scenario. It denies the ability of parents to know better than the state what is overall harmful or beneficial for their own children by way of any research and/or intellect and/or intuition and/or instinct. This denial is in the face of there being numerous medical doctors, indeed taught and awarded qualifications by the state itself of course, who have said that they choose not to vaccinate. The denial of the existence or value of any knowledge gained by way of instinct is also in the face of countless animals’ total dependency upon their instinct for their very survival.
Failure to explain how the threat will cause a change of parents’ minds, hearts and/or souls
The Minister for Social ‘Services’, Mr Scott Morrison, and Prime Minister Tony Abbott, have failed to explain how the threat of being denied funds may cause any parents’ research conclusions and/or intellect and/or consciences and/or personal religious views and/or intuition and/or instinct telling them that vaccinating may harm their children and/or be offensive to God, to experience a change of mind, heart and/or soul as to what is safest for their children and/or in accordance with the will of God.
Failure to explain how legislation fulfils the role of government to….
Mr Morrison and Mr Abbott have also failed to explain how a denial of funds to those families who are in financial need and who are unable to act contrary to their consciences is going to support their life and wellbeing, which is the very role of government.
Failure to demonstrate trustworthiness, and lack of any conflict of interest
They have failed to explain how they can be trusted to be personally motivated to seek what is best for others’ children whom they neither know, love nor whose wellbeing they have any personal interest, without any conflict of interest whatsoever.
They have failed to deny that this legislation arises from power or influence from pharmaceutical companies who manufacture the vaccines, to which power or influence they have chosen to yield on behalf of the people, without the consent of the people. There is evidence that this may be the case. The communications between politicians and other entities are not reliably open and transparent to the people. In cases in which many politicians who have been caught engaging in such communications exposing conflicts of interests, the said communications and conflicts of interest have escaped the public eye for some time, and potentially may do so indefinitely.
Callous disregard for struggling families and inalienable human rights
Mr Morrison and Mr Abbott have shown a callous disregard for not just struggling families, but for inalienable rights and freedoms expressed in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, the common law, major international human rights instruments that have been ratified by Australia (including The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 which guarantees, inter alia, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (Article 3), “All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law,” (Article 7): “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom… to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance” (Article 18) and the divine law of free choice and free will.
Assault, breach of right to fully voluntary consent
The blackmail legislation that they have proposed seeks to invade upon the bodies of children without full, voluntary, unpressured consent, which constitutes assault, even if no damage ensues.
The Constitutional and common law in Australia protects the right to bodily security and hence the right to informed consent. The Government itself, in its own Australian Immunisation Handbook, explains to doctors that for consent to vaccination to be legally valid, many elements must be present including that consent must be given “voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”.
The right to completely voluntary and fully informed consent to any medical procedure has been upheld repeatedly by High Court ruling after High Court ruling, after doctors have neglected to meet the requirements for legally valid consent before administering medical procedures. Yet this right, one of the important tenets upheld by the law in any free country, is being totally ignored by Mr Abbott and Mr Morrison.
Failure to consider the right to compensation from damage arising from proposed legislation
Further, in the event that parents submit to vaccination under this pressure and damage ensues, Mr Morrison or Mr Abbott have failed to explain how the state, as the new ‘owner’ of the children’s bodies, intends to fully compensate the forcibly vaccinated children for any vaccine damage that the Government admits may be occasioned upon them by those vaccinations.
ANH-Intl comment
We acknowledge that vaccination is a deeply emotive issue that divides people very strongly, in particular because parents are always trying to do the best for their children. However, any parents' choices are dictated by the limits of their knowledge base and we have long campaigned for better information on both sides of the debate to be readily available. Without sufficient information surrounding the questions of risk and benefit for particular vaccines and diseases they aim to protect against, it is impossible to make an informed choice. For those who have not yet considered some of the scientific arguments questioning the validity of routine vaccination, it may be helpful to read Suzanne Humphries' book, Dissolving Illusions, which we reviewed a while back. The Vaccine Epidemic is another balanced and enlightening read featuring more than twenty experts from the fields of ethics, law, science, medicine, business, and history.
It's not just the more obvious and unpredictable risk of vaccine side effects that warrant closer attention, it is also the effect of comprehensive vaccine schedules on children on their immune competence and ability to withstand both infectious and chronic diseases later in life. There are emerging data suggesting that vaccinatons may serve to compromise immunity and thereby the risk to vaccinated children is significantly greater than for unvaccinated children.
Tasha David, the mother who posted the petition in Australia, has 8 children. The first 6 she vaccinated and all have serious chronic conditions. Three are autistic, one has ADHD, one a severe language disorder and one severe mood swings, but they have also been plagued with chronic ear infections, bronchiolitis, asthma, eczema, psoriasis, urinary infections, gastrointestinal and autoimmune disorders, allergies, chemical sensitivities and intolerances. The youngest 2, aged 8 and 5, are unvaccinated and are in robust health. She is not alone in her experience.
At the heart of the current Australian controversy is the whooping cough/pertussis vaccine. As Tasha David points out, there was a 71 per cent vaccination rate for whooping cough in 1991 with only 347 cases, but in 2011 when the vaccination rate was over 92 per cent, there were over 38,000 cases. This increase that has occurred among both vaccinated and unvaccinated children cannot be blamed on the unvaccinated. Whooping cough has re-emerged, confirming that pertussis is not only a childhood disease but is also highly prevalent in adults. The latter group is known to be the major reservoir of infection for the majority of the whooping cough cases in infants and young children—including vaccinated ones. Yet, fuelled by the media and insufficient information, there is extreme animosity resulting in hatred-fuelled pitted battles, parent to parent, ongoing in Australia.
No resolution can come from divisive and judgmental argument. Respect for one another’s choices, understanding, discussion and debate can be the only ways forward given that the scientific facts are far from conclusive in any direction. Whilst there remains serious doubts over the safety and effectiveness of vaccination programmes in children, mandatory vaccination, or programs that coerce defenseless members of the public to participate unwillingly in vaccination, need to be abandoned. People power and a desire to defend constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms in Australia remain the primary weapons left against this bizarre threat to liberty.
CALL TO ACTION
If you live in Australia and want your voice heard, sign the petition
If you live outside Australia, but feel strongly about this issue, vote in the poll.
Comments
your voice counts
Joan Kelley
17 April 2015 at 4:03 am
Every citizen has a right to their own (and their children's) BODY! Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe and if there is ANY risk of harm, then a parent has the right to choose whether to vaccinate at all or to vaccinate at a slower pace. This insanity of forced injections of known neurotoxins into the bodies of children sounds a lot like Nazi Germany to me.
Ruth Ferris
18 April 2015 at 8:36 am
to impinge upon parental rights and punish parents for making informed decisions for their children is unconstitutional and scary. This might rise up and bite you and Abbott
Bev Pattenden
19 April 2015 at 6:45 am
As a Constitutional Professor recently said "When a government loses respect for its constitution and the people lose respect for their government, you are treading on dangerous ground. That is what happened in my country (Sri Lanka) and we had a 30 year war and over 100,000 people died before it was over."
Never a truer word was spoken. Our government is ignoring its responsibilities to its people, (who are becoming angrier by the day) and instead listening to those who benefit financially by the continuation and expansion of poisonous vaccines, causing death and destruction across the world. They will pay the price for their ignorance or criminal complicity in this great tragedy engulfing us.
megan johnson
22 April 2015 at 1:27 pm
I could write 20 pages on how wrong this is. I have sent letters to Parliament and am waiting for a reply.
Lee
15 December 2015 at 1:43 pm
I find it hard to understand why they inject vaccines into babies. For this reason; Vaccines work by creating an immune response in a human body, to have this happen you need to have a functioning immune system. Babies do not have a functioning immune system, at birth it is non-existent apart from the antibodies it has from the mother and by 2 years it is still developing. They are expecting a baby to have multiple agents injected at the same time and an undeveloped immune system to handle not one, but several processes at once, this would be hard enough for a fully developed immune system in an adult, the system would be bombarded with several things to deal with at once instead of only the one thing to understand and fight, but in a BABY? A baby which has no developed immune system yet? Several things at once? Every few months? Are you kidding? What sort of scam is this and why do people not understand how stupid it is to needlessly throw an undeveloped immune system into shock like this. I only wonder why more kids do not get damaged if they are doing this to them.
Michelle Petersen http://thevoiceofthecrow.com
17 December 2015 at 12:01 am
Well said Lee. And why is no one pushing adults to be fully vaccinated? I am 32 years of age. There are new vaccines on the schedule at present. So what, I am expected to inject my children so they don't spread disease but I don't need them and I won't spread disease? Even the very belief that a healthy child/adult will spread disease without a vaccination is the stupidest thing that makes no sense whatsoever.
Coleman kenny http://Judah
01 September 2016 at 11:43 pm
That's what the man that created vaccines wanted to inform the world about but that in the long term at about 13 to 17 years of age the vaccine kids all seemed to suffer identical symptoms adhd .fits and all sorts of symptoms but before he could tell the world hear had a nasty accident must been pure bad luck .what are the odds of that happing .strangely enough it seems to always happen to people who have something very serious and true to tell the people of the world about the serious affects these so called save government vaccines have on kids a baby just born been pumed with God knows what into there fragile little immune system and anatomy. How dose nobody think this is disturbing and highly dangerous putting lethal toxic into a baby 24 hours old .this is not just crazy but f*kin scary shit. I guarantee you that child will have problems all his r her life.so this means they will need medication all there lives.wich is the dirtiest most rotten way they now want to make and take your money and leave you with a sick child that will be getting hammered with all sorts of flues ,virus and God knows what for life. think they care not there child or problem .just a source of income for life on each child they can force them on. the morons of doctors I'm hoping are clueless as to the complications that this will cause on the baby and it's life and mother and father.because if there aware they should be punished . Severely. I'd rather not say what I'd do to them .
Ishe Boge
16 December 2015 at 2:05 pm
Happy to sign the petition, but nothing speaks louder than a class action.
Lynne Kershaw
17 December 2015 at 5:08 am
I was one of the mothers that lobbied the government about 18 years to stop vaccination from becoming compulsory and we were successful up until now. This is a gross violation of our human rights and I for one will never be bullied into doing something that I know could and probably would cause sever damage to one of my children or grandchildren. My son nearly died because of the DPT vaccine, and has lasting effects from his reaction. My younger 2 have never been vaccinated and are the healthiest kids I know! Lets do the studies and stop the fear and irrational vilification of parents that are making an informed choice!
Natalie
17 December 2015 at 9:53 am
What a completely one sided story, the Author should be ashamed. People are not being forced to vaccinate, they are simply having SOME not ALL government benefits scaled back. They will not lose all the main benefits.....however losing a childcare rebate because you want to risk the lives of other kids, not just your own, I think is a perfectly good adjustment. You all whinge and bitch about your choice NOT to vaccinate, but cannot respect my right to do so. I don't deliberately play in something that can make me sick, why should my kids be subjected to the same? You still have the freedom not to vaccinate, just don't expect free money to endanger kids around you.
Leanne http://leannehawkins.com.au
19 December 2015 at 6:33 am
okies lets look at it from our side can we?? We "were" mostly pro vaccine parents because we actually vaccinated our children?? We did not expect the serious adverse reactions that our children experienced and what's more we certainly didn't expect the backlash that followed when when we question the very uneducated medical people who gave the vaccines?? Trust us they say?? Whinge and bitch?? like really?? Is that your educated decision on parents who have already been through the worse experiences of watching there children suffer horrendous vaccine adverse reactions?? Not only that, we where never informed of the serious side effects?? nor the long term effects after the vaccines where given?? Really you say that we are one sided?? Lets looked at all the discrimination we suffer for speaking out?? For asking questions?? For wondering wtf we can do now are children have been effected and more so the long term effects?? I kid you not when I say the medical profession are not there for you when this happens?? Seriously you need to wake up to what is happening out here in the land/label of (medical terminology) Anti vaccination!! maybe you need early education on the experimental vaccines that failed animal studies given to children in orphanages ( lets get this right the animals died??)
John White
09 June 2016 at 8:13 am
Typical response as long as my kids are ok to hell with the vaccine injured or the ones that did not make it after receiving a vaccine. You will find most of these Mothers and Fathers were all for vaccines until vaccines injured or killed their child. Vaccines should be made safe before they inject Babies and children. No Baby should have to suffer being injured or killed by a vaccine. Wake up and see the truth and have some empathy for the people that have had to suffer the damage of a vaccine to their children
Wallina Sekula
17 December 2015 at 12:31 pm
I am beyond words!! I never thought such archaic barbarism woukd be happening in this country. You wont be touching my children. Non vaccinated and completely healthy!!
Lily Ricketts
26 May 2016 at 12:39 am
my four children are outstanding, no allergies, no outstanding bad behavoir, srtong sports athelete (14yr old) no illness. I attribute it to NO vaccines. Breast fed for almost 2 years at a time. Take a LOOK at what is in the vaccines they are poison!! Refer to Dr Stan Montieff Proffessor and on the World Health Organisation - He gives warning about vaccines. Study the history. My Dad was vaccinated for polio and almost died as a child. I was vacinated and had childhood cancer at 15, almost died. Also the ones that are vaccinated their immune is DAMAGED. Educate your self. Most people will vaccinate out of FEAR. The doctors are legal dealears for the millions of $$ for the pharmacitucal companies. Dontforget they are just people, the same person they used to promote cigarettes they used him to push vaccinnes in america. these are the medical proffession that condone abortion, murder of a baby. do your own homework form you r own conclusion. i for one have made the right decisin and will not be motivated by the money i wil loose. Shame on Australian politics for the blackmail and hold families at ransom..
Mike Fitzgerald
13 June 2016 at 1:20 pm
Hear hear.
Is there a body prepared to challange the consitutiinal legality of rhis new law. Maurice Blackburn may be ablento assist in galvanising such a body of folknwho may instigate a challange.
Who wouldminitiate this? Presumable a body which already exists.
Please dont wait until the law is passed before challanging it in ourt
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences