For more and more people, the logic and apparent science being used to justify extreme lockdown and social distancing measures is making less and less sense.
For weeks, the public was told the aim was to ‘flatten the curve’ to avoid critical care facilities in hospitals from being overrun. In most countries now, the curves have flattened. Very few critical care facilities were ever overrun – and what’s more, many hospitals were deserted, having most of their routine work cancelled, the consequences of which we’re yet to fully come to grips with.
Some countries like Sweden that endured lighter measures, didn’t suffer worse outcomes, suggesting that the natural history of the disease and natural immunity may have been as important if not more important in flattening the curve than complete lockdowns.
-
Find related articles, information and videos in our Covid Zone
Non-mainstream UK media channel UnHerd interviewed the ex-head of the European Centre for Disease Control, Swedish professor Johan Giesecke, only to follow it up with Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson. The fundamental differences in the views of both epidemiologists were palpable – all good fodder for a news channel. But also a reminder why governments seem so unclear about which measures work or how to exit from the various degrees of lockdown.
Over the last couple of weeks, we’ve seen unprecedented censorship of free expression on major social media platforms, with presentations by people like Dr Rashid Buttar being regularly banned, only to be re-posted by followers before being censored again.
We’ve witnessed the establishment of a crowd-funded new media platform, the Digital Freedom Platform, free from censorship on London Real, the brainchild of ex-banker turned journalist, Brian Rose.
We’ve seen doctors and nurses speak out, questioning the rationale of the measures and protocols they’re being asked to follow.
And, very significantly, a key legal challenge has been launched in Ireland, arguing the lockdown measures and potential for mandatory vaccines are unconstitutional.
Following are just a few of these dissenting voices - we're aware there are many more:
Drs Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi from Accelerated Urgent Care, California, USA - press conference (6:09)
Broadcast date: 22 April 2020
Link to full conference
Prof Knut M Wittkowski PhD, Epidemiologist, USA (1:04:25)
Publication date: 28 April 2020
Prof Johan Giesecke, Sweden (34:53)
Why lockdowns are the wrong policy
Publication date: 17 April 2020
Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters at The High Court Dublin, Ireland (3:24)
Broadcast date: 21 April 2020
Sara - Nurse/Practitioner Whistleblower, USA (10:25)
Publication date: 26 April 2020
Podcast - Cheryl Comley, Washington Post, USA (33:03)
Government Gone Wild
It's not just COVID-19 that is bringing about a government that's gone wild with the dictatorial style of leadership -- though the coronavirus is leading to some serious constitutional dings. But in Texas, the Supreme Court has a case of eye-opening proportions that's seeing a fit and proper biological dad having to fight for custody of his little girl -- because another guy who used to live with the girl feels like he's a dad. It's Real Dad vs Fake Dad, and Jeremy Newman with the Texas Home School Coalition has the shocking story.
Find related articles, information and videos in our Covid Zone
Comments
your voice counts
30 April 2020 at 11:51 am
Given the media censorship, which is unconstitutional and clearly agenda-based with no good in mind except for their own "bottom line", I suggest A) We the People take cell phone videos including original URL of anything bound to be censored, then upload to forums and blogs . Print out articles, or take cell phone pics and upload to blogs. Keep backup files, independently of the media. B) As a coordinated effort, write the media, holding them responsible for unbiased reporting, and that we are not supporting them based on their bias, while urging others to do the same C) Report any censorship (here in the USA) to the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation, or to similar entities abroad D) File class action lawsuits, they garner media attention and break through the media blackout, offered a political strategist. E) Organize a Coronagate investigation, independently of the Foxes Guarding the Henhouse (don't get the government involved), Close the Gates to the Foxes in the Henhouse. F) Sue left and right, and sue, and sue, and sue for damages. It is time. There should be lawsuits coming out of every corner, from entities, private cross sectors, class action, you name it. I far prefer to see lawsuits than riots and the like, good lord. It is time to teach the violators a lesson, break their bank, so they can never again even try to oppress the people in this way ever again. Suing the media would be one important and strategic move. Lawyers will find ways around the immunity invocation, and given the economic collapse there will be pressure on judges to rule in favor of the people for once. This pressure is bound to only mount as time goes on, and in the weeks to come, not years or decades. The time to act is now. Thank you all.
06 May 2020 at 11:44 am
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SqkfVxOLBCnO/
This is an important film. Please watch it and share it. It was on YouTube yesterday and received more that 15k views, so they deleted it. Dr Mikovits is a courageous woman and we should all wake up and take notice before it is too late
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences