Content Sections
Throughout history, as pronounced in the nineteeth century by German philosopher and mathematician Arthur Schopenhauer, new ideas that are eventually established as facts are first ridiculed, then violently opposed, before being accepted as self-evident. So – what of Gwyneth Paltrow’s brand, Goop? It’s currently being ridiculed and violently opposed, including by the chief executive of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), Sir Simon Stevens.
Launched in 2008 from the weekly newsletter penned in her kitchen to now encompass podcasts, products, food, travel, wellness and the newest addition - The Goop Lab now on Netflix.
As explained on the company’s website, Goop exists to start hard conversations, crack open taboos, and look for connection and resonance everywhere it can be found. This is something of a tall order, given some of the prices advertised on the online Goop shop – such as £114 for a Travel Meditation Kit or £26 for Psychic Vampire Repellent. The offerings are clearly not intended for those in deprived inner city areas.
In an effort to be transparent and appeal to its particular niche market, the Goop claims to cover “emerging topics that may be unsupported by science”, reporting on a wide range of health and wellbeing subjects that exist on the fringe of convention or mainstream medical systems. Goop encourages browsers to take the information they want and leave the rest. Some of their products such as healing stickers, a vagina scented candle and yoni eggs, have received a lot of media attention and been heavily criticised by mainstream medics. All this publicity can’t be doing Goop much harm; from modest beginnings in 2008, the company was estimated to be worth $250 million in 2018.
In an effort to expand its audience further, the Goop Lab, launched on Netflix on 24th January, to dire predictions that the ideas it promotes are ‘dangerous pseudoscience’. Considered so radical and dangerous NHS boss Simon Stevens described it as a “considerable health risk” that’s “spreading misinformation” to the public. Probably not a bad distraction from his main battle, to save a teetering NHS and it gives him something other than homeopathy to rail against.
In a trailer for the new series, Paltrow simply says the show “explores a range of ideas that may seem out there or too scary”. But her passion for exploring the new is evident when she remarks, “we only get one life, how best to milk the s***t out of it!”. The series sees the Goop Lab cast take a deep dive into a range of topics that appears to be designed to help those who have some spare time and money do just that and move their health, happiness and joy to the next level. Topics include female sexuality and pleasure (a topic Goop says is marginalised as people are uncomfortable discussing it), energy healing, cold therapy, dietary and lifestyle interventions, understanding emotion through psychics and psychedelics, and healing, to name a few of the particularly hot buttons for the mainstream.
The problem with pseudoscience
The concept of pseudoscience didn’t exist before professional science established a more formal footing. Since then questioning, offering new thinking or straying too far from accepted wisdoms and scientific ‘truths’ is likely to end up being branded as pseudoscience by those who happen to dislike or disagree with any ideas considered unprovable by established scientific measures. The boundaries between the two are far fuzzier than most scientists would have us believe though. Lurking on the fringes of mainstream scientific thinking many theories have been labelled as pseudoscience before being accepted. Even Freud is now being outed as a fraud by skeptics for promoting pseudoscience.
So, what’s all the fuss about? Far from being fringe, many of ideas being explored by the Goop Lab reflect important areas of emerging health that can get to the root of problems that are often untouched, or viewed as untouchable, by the medical mainstream. That includes dealing with childhood trauma, phobias and sexual problems. Goop explores and shares natural and non-pharmaceutical health options with those who wish to have an alternative to, or are disillusioned by, the limitations of mainstream offerings.
We decided to take a look at some of the so-called ‘woo-woo’ therapies considered to be ‘dangerous’ that are being explored by the Goop Lab and evaluate them against the available science.
Goop recommended therapies
- ‘Woo-woo Therapy’ 1: Cold therapy - cold therapies have been used for centuries to enhance wellbeing. The Goop team were introduced to Wim Hof and the Wim Hof Method involving cold therapy (ice baths and challenges) and specialist breathing techniques designed to improve our resilience to physical and psychological stresses. An easy way to incorporate cold therapy into your daily regime without the extremes of Wim Hof is to take cold showers. Anyone who reads Wim Hof’s books Becoming the Iceman (Hillcrest Publishing Group, 2011) and The Way of the Iceman (Dragon Door Publications, 2017) will be left in no doubt that the approach he uses has been subjected to extensive scientific scrutiny. ANH rating: Goop 1, Pseudoscience 0.
- ‘Woo-woo Therapy 2’ - Diet - Goop Lab explored a range of areas, including longevity and healthy ageing, that are strongly associated with diet. Goop looks at the connection between diet and mental health, the importance of eating the right fats, how specific diets can be used to combat autoimmune diseases, why gluten is so harmful to many, along with the benefits of using supplements. We’re with Goop on these issues – and it’s high time the medical mainstream made them front and centre of what it does based on the available scientific and clinical evidence.
- ‘Woo-woo Therapy’ 3: Healthy ageing – More and more of our years are now being spent in poor health, with diseases of old-age rearing their heads at an earlier time in an ever greater number of people’s lives. The Goop team considered the positive effects of biological stress, the impact of epigenetics on our health, what knowing our biological age can tell you about your health, the role of telomeres in ageing and what we can learn about healthy ageing from those living in Blue Zones. All good stuff in our view, and people who’re interested should be able to access this information.
- ‘Woo-woo Therapy’ 4: Releasing trauma through energy healing – the powerful effects of trauma on our health is only just beginning to be recognised and accepted by mainstream medics. Energy healing confers many benefits as determined by clinical experience, its ongoing popularity and a small stable of published studies. One of its challenges is that skeptics fail to consider its proposed mechanisms as plausible and it does not lend itself well to randomised controlled trials because sham treatments for the control are just that, a sham. This fuels skepticism around the effectiveness of healing practices, especially among those who have yet to indulge either as therapist or patient. There are many different energy therapies that have been found to be helpful in releasing blocked energy and associated traumas from acupuncture through to Reiki.
These are just a few of many examples. We would like to suggest that it’s not a crime to be curious, to think outside of the box and explore alternate ways of improving our health. There’s also a very important point around freedom of expression and the maintenance of free markets, both being rights or values that have been central to what we like to think of as ‘civilised societies’.
Goop isn’t denying or challenging mainstream medicine. It’s offering alternatives, sometimes with a bit of added humour, to those with spare money in the pocket looking for another way to improve and engage with their health. OK, for the uninitiated it might all sound a bit wacky and there are times when Goop unnecessarily invites criticism, such as through its wealthy, largely ethnically white exposure to indigenous systems of medicine, such as ayahuasca ceremonies.
In our view the biggest problem we foresee is the unwarranted ‘killing of the messenger’ that seems aimed to taint all that Ms Paltrow touches or exposes. When government health authorities start to cast aspersions, based on personal belief and no proper understanding of what lies behind it, we have, we believe, a problem. And Simon Steven’s recent interventions after Goop’s Netflix launch put a marker in the sand that needs to be watched very carefully.
So – let’s defend freedom of expression, especially when it doesn’t seek to tarnish or destroy others who hold different views.
Further Reading
Following are some resources from the ANH archives to help you start your journey to becoming a health creator, or hone your health creation mastery.
- Food4Health guidelines
- Food4Health eRecipe books
- Browse our Food4Health feature articles
- Have a flick through our library of video Health Hacks full of science-based tips, tried and trusted health wellbeing tips to inspire you
- Check out the links in the article above to find out more about the subjects discussed
Comments
your voice counts
Steve Friedman
05 February 2020 at 10:19 pm
Let the Market decide, what works persists, what doesn't disappears!
Brian Steere http://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk/
06 February 2020 at 10:03 am
For people or 'the market' to make valid choices, we need free access to valid information, and for services to be marketed we need regulatory support for transparency and accountability.
What we currently have is the marketeers 'deciding' what will persist and what will be 'disappeared' not least as a result of the capture (control) of those institutions - including Media - that are supposed to regulate them or hold to account.
Racketeering works by guile, deceit and coercion to undermine rivals - not be making a better product or service, but by more funding (for political and media) leverage in setting the narrative and consequent rules that effectively frame and control what can be said and done at any level of influence.
Free association of information and exchange has to be protected by a culture of responsibility - not of blame.
A blame culture operates the replacement of communication, research or enquiry, by giving power of decision away.
Deceit operates to frame you in narrative identity such as to want to give power away to provided 'solutions' to cultivated and leveraged fears, as a notional security from having to face and question fears in self-honesty.
But under the belief that feared outcomes are being averted or mitigated - while they are being psychically induced into the field of associations of cure, answer or panacea embraced 'wishfully' rather than as a conscious willingness of relational integrity.
In this sense we are piling up our fears in hell (denials pushed from consciousness that effectively then define and frame our perception and response), such as to seek or accept hell-management as a replacement for renewal and regeneration or healing and restored function.
This response is to what your comment brought up - not a personal response to you, Steve.
So let a willingness of self-honesty and communication arrive at honourable and honouring decision or else recognise the lack of such a love of truth is the willingness to be persistently predated upon and incrementally 'disappeared'.
There is currently very little scope for honest communication, as a result of painting ourselves into a corner. Language and thought have been weaponised and marketised to serve a notional security as a split minded (dissociated) sense of 'command and control' as authoritative overriding of communication by fear and blame narrative.
There is no talking to the dissociated. They are running under identity theft as a result of invested reaction to unowned fears that have replaced their capacity to see or hear, with a 'thinking' that seems to operate autonomously and robotically as a self-defence that persists the false in order to make that which is feared true, disappear.
Nowadays, people can and are being induced to campaign or align in support of agenda that either intends their own degradation and destruction or accepts it as the 'consequence of the Market' in which the predator gets to persist, while the prey disappears. For this to be sustainable, the Market must be globally directed. WHO is to manage the stock.
Redeeming our thought, word and deed from false framed thinking is a result of bringing error to a truly present awareness. What has no foundation in truth can no longer persist as IF it is true, and to persist in a lie becomes the knowing alignment in fear of truth. This is disturbing, but fertile to the possibility of questioning a reality that previously operated as unquestionably self-evident.
We are being lied to. But we are also choosing to listen by allowing thought of hidden fear set in defence to run instead of our right mind.
No one in their right mind wants to hurt themselves or others - and no one who thinks to have secured their self within conflict management identity, lets their right mind back into awareness.
And so we have a split between a mask of believed or defended security and transparency to freedom of being.
I see this as our primary choice, for, according to which we align in, does a whole world arise to reinforce its premise, by which the other disappears. But while habits can persist as conditioned reaction after their foundation is released, truth of our being will never really go away - and insinuates itself into any attempt to override or control it, as dissonance of alarm to a condition of misalignment, off-balance and out of true - that shall become the freedom to question what seems to be subjection to an outer reality of dissociated denials or unforgivenesses set in rules, structures and systems of 'care and concern'.
Heather Rosa
06 February 2020 at 9:55 am
Market forces are ok if there is the freedom to choose...
Dianne @ PEMF-devices.com https://pemf-devices.com
17 February 2020 at 10:32 am
Great one ANH, thankfully for most of us goops are immediately visible. It takes time to build credibility and that only happens when the research is authentic.
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences