Content Sections
Most of the media debate around Brexit is now focused on the Boris vs Jeremy show – who will win the leadership contest for the Conservative party and inherit the role as the UK’s next Prime Minister.
At the top of many people’s list is what happens to the Irish border. For others it’s all about the British car industry that has long benefited from access to the single market for both labour and parts.
Somewhere down the list of priorities is agriculture – despite the fact that everyone needs to eat. The low priority is at least in part because agriculture contributes only 0.6% to the UK GDP, as against 18% for the manufacturing sector and a whopping 70% from the services sector.
Those kinds of figures don’t get politicians and economists too excited, especially when you take into account that agriculture occupies around 75% of the UK’s land area. It also means that politicians and economists are more interested in what trade deals in a post-Brexit environment might mean because the UK imports around half of the food it consumes. But things don’t look particularly bright when the effect of EU subsidies have made British agriculture uncompetitive on the world stage. Around 50-60% of farm incomes on average come through CAP, but in some areas (e.g. Wales) it can be as high as 80%.
When EU subsidies are gone
When the UK pulls out of the EU, subsidies paid through the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) will be phased out within a decade. These are direct payments (presently around £3 billion annually) paid simply to those who own the land. They don’t in any way align with the benefits that land ownership and farming can have, such as reducing ammonia emissions, protecting wildlife or sequestering carbon. This means too many have farmed for subsidies, not for sustainable food production.
Environment Minister Rt Hon Michael Gove has been developing a plan that is now incorporated into the new Agriculture Bill that‘s wending its way through Parliament. It will replace the outdated EU subsidies system that has accelerated damage to the environment. The Bill is presently at the ‘report’ stage in the House of Commons so there are ample opportunities for amendment.
“Green Brexit”
There are undoubtedly some progressive elements in the current language of the Agriculture Bill that are intended to make British agriculture greener. Some of this is about rewarding farmers when they contribute to environmental benefits, such as planting hedges or trees, increasing biodiversity, sequestering carbon, reducing ammonia emissions.
Michael Gove and the government go as far as claiming the Agriculture Bill has the potential to deliver a Green Brexit. But get this…Michael Gove also supports gene editing (a form of genetic modification or GM) in agriculture and its use to invoke a genetic revolution.
Will Big Ag weigh in?
There have been many examples of good policies that get manipulated by crony capitalists during their journey through the democratic system and turn out bad for people or planet, or both.
This is why it’s imperative that Big Ag and Big Biotech don’t amend the Bill in ways that convert the Agriculture Bill to a post-Brexit policy that transitions from green to brown. Organic agriculture and agro-ecological farming remain the only ways to ensure the environment and sustainable food production are protected – and that GM agriculture and contamination caused by it are locked out.
Among our top 4 concerns that link to the sustainability of the food supply are what will happen with:
- Genetically modified (GM) crops
- Hidden GM ingredients in food
- Organic agriculture
- Unsustainable industrial farming
Call to action for UK residents
To influence the Agriculture Bill and impact these four concerns, we call on UK residents to act on the following:
- Support organic and agro-ecological farming by getting your MP to support amendments N1 and N2 of the Agriculture Bill now at the ‘report’ stage in the House of Commons. You can copy a form letter created by the Soil Association here and send it to your MP, whose details you can find here.
- Use the “Tweet your MP” template, enter your postcode and let new farming minister Robert Goodwill know you don’t see a place for GM in the UK.
- Sign the GM Freeze petition to ensure mandatory GM labelling is maintained post-Brexit so food producers can’t hide GM ingredients on labels, as they do, for example, in the USA.
SAVE THE DATE!
You may also want to participate in or tune into the RSA Future is in Our Lands debate at the RSA in London at 18:00 - 19:15h GMT on 16th July. Here, Michael Gove MP and Henry Dimbleby will join the chair of the RSA Food, Farming and Countryside Commission, Sir Ian Cheshire, to discuss the launch of the Commission's final report.
Comments
your voice counts
Brian Steere http://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk/
27 June 2019 at 11:37 am
Unsustainable practice is simply a destructive agenda masking as self inflated power and protection. Destruction can arise from natural agencies and events that are generally interpreted in terms of guilt or sin and punishment. This proclivity to guilted fear of further pain of loss is the effect of separation trauma that our consciousness is predicated upon AS a split levelled and masking mind. The emergence of a priesthood and aristocracy class as the intermediary between destructive power and survival, protection and mitigation of pain of loss became systemic capture and control device that reenactment or usurps the archetypes of trauma and grievance as the basis for sustaining powerlessness of willingness to sacrifice life and truth for conformity and compliance to external gods or narratives that set and frame us in terms of feared evils- which IS the split division of a sense of sel separateness and self lack under false thinking, clung to as power or protection.
To the 'ruling' elitism any outcome in which it loses its seeming power is resisted as threat of a greater evil than managing, packaging and presenting the conflict or toxic debt in forms of social credit under framing of outsourced guilt and pain of loss.
Sustainability is a vaccinated term that carries and spreads the disease it purportedly sets out to overcome. This pattern of double think uses the mind to undermine its true or natural function so as to remain dependent and captured under an alien thought system. At this level, fear and control call upon and embody an alien or unnatural will that usurps and destroys in the name or form of life, freedom and protection. Giving power to the mask takes away from where true power shares.
As the technologism enabled weaponisation and marketisation of every vector or agency of influence, so do cartels of private interest corrupt and subvert all thought, feeling and action therefrom.
Waking to the nightmare is sill within the dreaming of a false sense of self, power and relationship. The desecration of life, relationships and world needs be recognised as a true need for Sanity of a peace of unconflicted being as the basis from which to live a reintegrative healing and awakening purpose in place of feeding truth and life to private or hidden agenda under masking of our own conflict denials.
Uncovering and realigning in a biodiversity of relational endeavour in place of top down toxic canopy for monocultured sterility in self denialism and death is part of a reawakening of true communication, outside the false frame of the 'psyop'.
A mind under the spell of its own spin is fortunately unsustainable - but its ingenuity in evading or delaying the inevitable (truth) is a world of lies.
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences