UPDATE! (7th May 2013)
Our thanks to the anonymous commenter who pointed this out to us. On 3rd May, the website Child Health Safety posted an article that contains some interesting data, straight from the horse's mouth: the Public Health Wales Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC).
The article shows that the high numbers of measles cases in Swansea being reported in the UK mainstream media are the 'notified' cases, i.e. those reported by healthcare professionals. In March 2013, for example, 238 measles cases were notified in the Swansea area, while the figure for 1st January to 31st March was 343. By contrast, the number of laboratory-confirmed - i.e. actual - measles cases in Swansea in March 2013 was 3. Yes, three. The overall 2013 tally was 13. Doing a quick bit of maths, that's an overdiagnosis rate of 7930% for March and 2638% for 2013.
Public Health Wales figures show that 1039 cases of measles have been notified in 2013 so far in mid- and west Wales, leading to media suggestions of 'over 1000' cases. It will be interesting to see the lab-confirmed cases for April and May when they become available, as Public Health Wales doesn't see fit to include them on the same page as notifications.
In other words, there is no measles 'epidemic' in Wales. So why is hysteria being manufactured in order to vaccinate as many Welsh citizens as possible?
Let’s keep this short, shall we? The ongoing measles and vaccination hysteria in the UK is unjustified and benefits no-one but the drug companies and government.
It’s measles, not bubonic plague!
Not too long ago, the news that a UK community was living through a measles outbreak would have elicited a collective shrug of the shoulders. An adult reaction to what is, admittedly, a potentially dangerous childhood disease – but one that generations of parents have managed effectively through rational nursing.
Today, it’s easy to forget that these same parents were, until recently, in the habit of throwing ‘measles parties’ to ensure their kids’ lifelong immunity. To study the reaction of the media and officialdom to an ongoing measles outbreak in Swansea, south Wales, anyone would think we were dealing with a resurgence in tuberculosis or bubonic plague – diseases that represent a genuine public health threat to otherwise healthy kids.
Beating the vaccination drum
Of course, the reason given for the outbreak is that insufficient people have been vaccinated for measles, which in the UK in 2013 is exclusively available as the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) triple vaccine on the National Health Service (NHS). Official NHS figures show that MMR takeup rates in the affected areas were below the 95% figure touted as necessary to achieve ‘herd immunity’ against measles, both at 2 years and 5 years of age.
Case closed? Well no, not really. There are a couple of problems with this assertion, one of which – and it’s a biggie – is that ‘herd immunity’ is an unproven theory with its basis in natural immunity, not vaccination. Not only that, but there is a certain inconsistency in the NHS’ presentation of its own data. The Swansea figures show that around 87% of children received two doses of the MMR vaccine by age 5 in 2011–12, a number that has been increasing steadily over the past few years. A map of the same data (Figure 1) confirms this, with Swansea in the ’85.0 to 87.4%’ bracket. This puts Swansea well within the 83–94% vaccine coverage range thought necessary for ‘herd immunity’ against measles by the World Health Organization (WHO) and US Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Figure 1. Map of Wales showing uptake of two MMR doses by age 5 in 2011–12. Taken from http://wales.gov.uk/docs/statistics/2012/120828sdr1392012en.pdf.
But never mind all that – it’s all the fault of the non-vaccinators, we’re told, and there’s an MMR catch-up campaign in full swing in Swansea. Somehow, it is deemed 99% effective, even though it’s only been operative for a week. It appears that the UK government is intent on vaccinating every child in the country with MMR, which will make its friends in the pharma industry very happy.
Scapegoating Wakefield again
Not only that, but the media and establishment took the chance to have yet another pop at Dr Andrew Wakefield, whose 1998 research first raised still-unanswered questions over the safety of the MMR vaccine. Wakefield’s measured response to the new round of attacks (transcript here) powerfully brings home the fact that the voices of sanity in this overheated debate are coming from those who question the blanket advocacy of multiple vaccines for all children, for more and more diseases. People like Dr Jayne Donegan, whose article on measles is a must-read for every concerned parent. Hardly coincidentally, Dr Donegan was, like Wakefield, the subject of a General Medical Council witch-hunt – one that fortunately failed.
Natural immunity, anyone?
Nowhere in the mainstream media is the concept of natural immunity being seriously discussed. Effectively, their position is that the human immune system is inherently weak and inefficient, and that without the miracle of vaccines we’re all at the mercy of myriad killer bugs. At this point, it’s apt to quote Dr Donegan’s measles article directly: “Measles outbreaks in unimmunised people tend to be mild in those who do not have underlying medical conditions. In communities which generally do not immunise, the attack rate in infants less than one year of age is low because of protection by the superior maternal antibodies derived from natural infection compared to those derived from vaccination...A study conducted by the Danish epidemiologist Tove Rønneand published in the Lancet in 1985, found that having measles with a typical rash was associated with a lower incidence of developing immunoreactive diseases, sebaceous skin diseases, diseases of bone, cartilage and certain tumours in adult life...”
In short, just as with the incipient bird flu pandemic, the best protection against measles is to boost the immune systems of you and your children, and to know how to nurse measles when it occurs. Our report, The pivotal role for natural products in countering an avian influenza pandemic, contains plenty of ideas, and Dr Donegan’s article has excellent advice on measles nursing.
So before you're tempted to buy into the measles hype, take a pause to read up on the actual stats! And take heart that our bodies do have an innate and intelligent immune system that, when worked with and supported appropriately, rather than being over-burdened, offers us about the best protection we could wish for.
Call to action
- Measles won't get a foothold if you incorporate more of the immune-boosting nutrients recommended in our report into your diet and lifestyle and those of your kids, along with a healthy, organic, genetically modified (GM) ingredient-free diet and sufficient exercise! And don't forget vitamin D, along with probiotics or fermented foods, such as kombucha, sauerkraut, natto, kimchi or kefir – and reduce that stress!
- Read up on how to nurse measles in case your kids do come down with it
Comments
your voice counts
Anonymous
02 May 2013 at 7:51 am
So Big Pharma failed with the 'Bird flu Epidemic' which cost them mega bucks, so now they try with measles. Corruption, emotional blackmail, vaccine damage - what next?
Bill LaChenal
02 May 2013 at 12:49 pm
Has anyone analysed the DNA strain of measles in Swansea?
Is it a strain already known to research laboratories such as Porton Down or QinetiQ sub-contractors? Will we ever know?
My guess is that it's not a wild strain, or we'd have had more cases of bad effect on youngsters who health was already compromised (or who weren't afforded the classical management of keeping away from sunlight etc.) Reservoirs of wild strains are tougher in general.
There has been a death, but the poor fellow was a 25-year-old asthmatic, living on his own, who was earlier turned away from hospital. This when the authorities have been desperately "needing" a tragedy to prove their case and frighten more people. Perhaps they could blame some local traffic accidents on measles?
Question two: What is the incidence of measles amongst the local population already vaccinated with (various) MMR? It's usually non-zero, I understand, but one wonders if it is a significant percentage. How many are "serious"? One could study incidence other groups too, such as those who went abroad to get single vaccines, and those who opt for more "natural" health care.
Question three: Is the local NHS - whoever might be responsible in the new set-up - collating adverse effects, by age, amongst the new MMR intake? And comparing results to autism-spectrum and IBS incidence in the refusenik population? I'm taking here of the previously observed time-scale of development, not an artificial one-day/two-week limited measure.
It's a golden opportunity to see what is really happening, albeit at relatively small scale. (statistical rank tests would be sensitive enough?) Better than a continuing homogeneous experiment on the entire UK population without statistical controls, I would have thought.
Perhaps our new Chief Scientific Officer should suggest it to them. She seems to have an interest in matters pharmaceutical.
brainbox
02 May 2013 at 6:12 pm
There is a seasonal pattern to the measles outbreaks. The numbers showing a peak in april. See page 2 for number of measles cases in 2011 and 2012 in part of Europe and page 3 for the numbers in the United Kingdom
http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/measles-rubella-monthly-surveillance-dec-2012.pdf
What is missing during the winter months? The UVB part of sunshine. No sunshine hormone / vitamin D can be produced in our skin.
The stored amounts of vitamin D are used up by our body during the winter months.
And if we stay indoors our slather ourselves with sun blocking cream not enough vitamin D will be produced during summer. Vitamin D is responsible for a healthy answer to immun system challenges like bacteria or virus.
Wotan
02 May 2013 at 7:55 pm
I saw the drivel on MMR written by the intellectual pygmy`Aaronovitch in today's Times. There are two facts people ought to know:
1) It was irrefutably established in the US that human DNA had been used in the manufacture of the MMR vaccine. When investigated it turned out that during the use of this particular batch there was a very close correlation between autism and the use of MMR, i.e. it was highly likely that the vaccine had caused autism.
2) The carrier used for the delivery of the MMR vaccine contains mercury - one of the nastiest toxins known to man. In other words, parents are expected to have their children injected with mercury. Obviously, there is no "safe" limit for mercury, which means that anyone injected with the MMR vaccine will eventually suffer from the "side effects" of mercury. And this nonsense is recommended by the mainstream media and the British medical establishment.
JulietOc http://julietocallaghan.wordpress.com/
04 May 2013 at 9:25 am
What you have to remember is that measles is very dangerous for those who are immunosuppressed, such as children having treatment for cancer. These children are not able to have the vaccine and therefore they rely on herd immunity to protect them. So yes, for the majority of children measles will not be serious or dangerous, but an epidemic will invariably claim vulnerable people.
AS a friend of a child in the situation, you can imagine how difficult this makes life and how angry she is that through other peoples right not vaccinate their children, they increase the risks to her child (who has enough to contend with fighting infections that are not so easily vaccinated against).
Mumps and Rubella are also both mild diseases in most cases - rubella is dangerous to unborn children, which is the reason children are vaccinated to protect the unborn, not themselves.
This article is rather Darwinian in tone - survival of the fittest, and rather distasteful in its dismissal of the 25 year old who died (after contracting measles), because he had asthma.
So yes, if your children are fit and healthy, then why bother with mumps and rubella either - sod the unborn child, it probably would have been born with weak immunity anyway. And while we are at, lets give polio another run for its money and tuberculosis would be a great way to reduce the population, particularly those in poverty.
Believe me I am not a fan of the stranglehold pharmaceutical companies have. I am an advocate of herbal remedies and am actively trying to get the dosage restrictions on agnus castus lifted, but that doesn't mean I reject all medical interventions. Do we really want to return to the good old days, when children were paralysed by polio and young mothers died of tuberculosis, and those vulnerable members of our community were exposed to measles?
Anonymous
05 May 2013 at 11:35 am
You need to correct this story.
There was only ONE confirmed case of measles in the Swansea area in March according to recent figures of laboratory confirmed cases published Health Protection Wales. There were only 8 laboratory confirmed cases in the whole of Wales in March.
You can get the full details here:
<a title="2013 MEASLES NEWS: The UK’s Fake Welsh Measles Epidemic – Only 8 Cases Confirmed For March – 302 Wrongly Diagnosed and “Notified” By Docs" href="http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/2013-uk-fake-measles-epidemic/" rel="bookmark">2013 MEASLES NEWS: The UK’s Fake Welsh Measles Epidemic – Only 8 Cases Confirmed For March – 302 Wrongly Diagnosed and “Notified” By Docs</a>
ANH Admin
07 May 2013 at 4:14 pm
Hi, many thanks for the information - we've added an update to our article at the top of the piece.
Anonymous
13 May 2013 at 1:15 pm
Public Health Wales omitted to tell the media and public when giving out only figures for notifications that:
“Reported notifications of measles usually far exceed the actual numbers of confirmed cases. Other rashes are often mistaken for measles. ”
From 'Measles' published by Public Health Wales Health Protection Division
http://tinyurl.com/cq5blbp
And along with other false claims being put out - BBC have been caught doctoring the news - they removed the false claim from a story that 1 in 1000 would die - but did it so no one can tell they published false news - they also changed the headline - did not update the "last updated" time - and put no notification they did anything:
UPDATE MEASLES UK 2013 – BBC News Secretly Removes Fake News Claims from Website – Health Officials in Tail-Spin Over Vastly Hyped Claims of Welsh Measles Epidemic
http://wp.me/pfSi7-1Ru
Anonymous
22 May 2013 at 10:20 pm
I think it is hugely unfair to expect parents to put their children at risk by having a vaccination just to protect immunosupressed children. Emotional blackmail.
I would question WHY children are getting autoimmune disorders and cancers, look at the links with vaccination. If people got more clued up on the dangers of vaccination, read the inserts, googled the ingredients, investigated the "live virus" issues and clued themselves up on the cancerous tumours used to GROW the viruses put in vaccinations THEN maybe we wouldn't have these poor children getting sick.
Let's deal with the root issue, vaccinations are poisonous, toxic, at best a huge insult to the immune system and at worst lethal.
Childhood illnesses stopped being killers when we introduced sanitation and improved nutrition and living conditions. Vaccinations came after that and made everyone ill again.
Stop vaccinations and the world would be a happier and healthier place.
Rant over...............
Anonymous
29 May 2013 at 5:26 pm
I understand that the confirmed cases of measles in the recent outbreak are very different to the notified number of cases. Could anyone explain to me what the so called 'diagnosed' cases of measles were, if they are now thought to have been some other illness?
Anonymous
29 May 2013 at 6:19 pm
I understand that the confirmed number of measles cases are very different to the notified number of cases in the recent outbreak. Can anyone explain what the 'diagnosed' cases were if they weren't measles?
Anonymous
09 June 2015 at 8:57 am
I would like to warn young mothers who do not get their kids vaccinated can actually cause more trouble if they get the condition.
A year after contacting the condition myself, I started getting seizures and have had them now, off and on, ever since. I have also met people who are now partially sitted due to having had measles and one lady who is now deaf.
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences