Content Sections
Most of us reading this likely live in what we still call a ‘free world’, and that’s great. But equally, we are jointly and severally responsible for the planet on which we live. So it’s a compelling argument to propose that if we could all change the way we eat and live this can save the planet that’s in desperate straits environmentally, especially. Not only that, there’s broad agreement among scientists and the medical community that the food we eat is one of the strongest determinants of our health. And a lot of it, especially the processed stuff lining our supermarket shelves, is not doing most of us much good.
It’s out of this thought bubble that Veganuary has evolved. If it means cutting out some food groups we love dearly, well, surely we should make this sacrifice to save our planet. Especially if there are health benefits to be had along the way that go some way to filling the gap left by our unfulfilled desires.
But the idea that going vegan will save the planet is a notion we struggle with because it’s so over-simplified. More than this there are no adequate data that can robustly support the idea.
Just a few facts drive a steamroller through the premise that veganism is the only route to resolving our interlinked planetary and health crises:
- Animal farming, including the often maligned farming of cattle, can be carbon neutral. But it requires that animals are grass-fed and there’s attention given to diversifying the farm landscape. Scotland’s grass-fed beef farms are already carbon neutral and a study of Australia’s intensive sheep and beef farms shows they could readily be made carbon neutral or net positive by planting more trees. It’s not the animals themselves that are the problem. It’s the way they are farmed and fed by the behemoth that’s the pervasive industrial agri-food complex that now dominates food and farming that’s the real issue.
- Livestock and animals are needed to build healthy, living, organic matter-rich soils that are central to making farming sustainable and turning farms into net carbon sinks, not emitters. Most good farmers will tell you it’s difficult to build rich, organic matter-laden, water-retaining, biologically-active soils without animal manures. This has been demonstrated in numerous studies over decades, including one in Sweden, and another in Nebraska, USA.
- While large-scale industrial farming contributes to waste, pollution and is a significant contributor to climate change, the same cannot be said of regionally-adapted, agro-ecological farming approaches that are crucial to food security, environmental protection and compassionate animal welfare standards.
- The view that food security for the projected 9+ billion expected by 2050 requires large, industrial-scale, economic units of production that use intensive, modern, technologically-advanced methods making new-to-nature foods, has no scientific basis.
- Vegan diets are inherently nutrient deficient, especially for active people. They lack the appropriate balance of amino acids, they are deficient in some fatty acids (e.g. EPA, DHA) as well as some essential vitamins and minerals, notably vitamin B12, zinc and heme iron. They may also expose people to high levels of certain plant compounds, such as certain food-derived lectins (e.g. in beans, pulses, grains), that may damage gut membrane function, reduce nutrient assimilation and contribute to excessive permeability.
It’s therefore not the food we eat that’s the main issue. It’s how we grow and make our food that’s the real, underlying problem. That means Veganuary doesn’t really tackle the fundamental challenges it seeks to resolve. In fact, it may actually act, albeit unwittingly, as a spring board for those seeking to monetise their latest technology with a helping hand from the ever-ready industrial agri-food complex.
That applies especially to lab-grown meatless meat technology which is sold to us on the premise it will save both planet and people when the truth is that we have no idea if it can live up to its promises.
With this backdrop, we think we should consider with a healthy degree of scepticism all proposals for lab-grown meat alternatives that risk damaging sustainable agro-ecological production systems and as well as human health.
Business as usual is not an option: Alternatives to Veganuary
2020 turns the page on a decade that will be seminal to the nature of future life on planet Earth. Big changes are going to be needed and we know from past experience these won’t come in the right form or won’t come quickly enough if we rely solely on governments. We, the people, need to be the drivers of change.
So while for some, going vegan for the month, and potentially for longer if the experience seemed worthwhile, is a goer, here’s a list of some other things you might want to consider to help turn the tables to the benefit of both people and planet.
- Go bar code free. Avoid buying any processed or packaged foods from a supermarket. Eat whole foods, whether it’s fruit or veg. If you eat meat, support local butchers or farm shops that can guarantee they supply meat or dairy from grass-fed animals. You might only manage this for 30 days, but in that time you’ll likely develop some good habits, some of which might be worth sticking with
- Go ultra-processed free. Much of the food we eat is processed to some extent. Take even cold-pressed, unfiltered olive oil, for example, which is minimally processed. But it’s a far cry from ultra-processed refined vegetable oil blends, or ready-made meals or sugar-coated breakfast cereals.
- Go grass-fed. Don’t buy any meat or dairy unless the seller can confirm the product is derived solely from grass-fed animals. That’s a tough ask in most supermarkets, but it’s much easier to get information about from local sellers, farmer’s markets, the farm gate, food cooperatives or box schemes.
- Offer yourself offal. There is massive wastage in the animal food industry and it’s not wrong to say that our dogs and cats often eat the bits of animals that are better for us than those given to humans. The BSE crisis took offal meats off many people’s menus and now many rely heavily on lean muscle-based meats, such as chicken breasts, beef mince or steaks, avoiding organs, intestines and all the other bits that are used in proper nose-to-tail eating. In this vein (excuse the pun), the Public Health Collaboration in the UK have launched Organuary that promotes the eating of organ meats that are a fantastic repository of essential and conditionally-essential nutrients, including nucleotides that are so important for gastro-intestinal and immune health.
- Avoid air miles. Don’t eat any food that’s been shipped by plane. Try and avoid exotic foods that have come in by boat if you can. The more local, the better. Transport of food is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and we can all do more to select our food carefully, preferring local and regionally sourced foods where possible.
And if you do Veganuary….
One final note, if you do decide to go vegan in January, follow our Food4Health Vegan Guidelines and take supplements that fill some key nutritional gaps.
We’d recommend at least the following:
- Branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine, in 2:1:1 ratio): at least 5g daily
- Algal DHA/EPA, 1-2 g daily
- Vitamin B12 (as methylcobalamin, hydroxocobalamin and/or 5′-deoxyadenosylcobalamin), 50-5000 mcg/d
- Vitamin B6, preferably in the bioactive pyroxidal-5’-phosphate form, 25 mg/d
- Reduced folate, as 5-MTHF (e.g. calcium-L-methylfolate, (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt), 1000 mcg/d
- Zinc (avoid consuming alongside cereals or grains as phytate prevents absorption), 15-30 mg daily.
- Iron (non-heme) (e.g. as bisglycinate, gluconate), 20 mg/d for women, 10 mg/d for men
- RNA nucleotides (e.g. from Brewer’s yeast [Saccharomyces cerevisiae]), pyrimidine (not purine) dominant, 500-1000 mg/d.
Find out more
ANH-Intl Special Report: Analysis of the EAT-Lancet report (2019)
Plant-based eating – the ‘diet’ that’s no fad (2018)
Special Report Vitamin B6 – “It’s the Form, Stupid” (2017)
To be vegan or vegetarian, or not to be (2016)
Irish debate: Animals – do we need them in our diets? (2016)
Comments
your voice counts
Derek Osborn www.yoga-sadhana.org
08 January 2020 at 9:42 pm
The suggestions to eat more less refined, natural foods also stimulates bigger involvement in food preparation, cooking etc and the opportunities for more ‘social’ dining.
Paul Newman
08 January 2020 at 10:00 pm
Thank you, another voice (albeit drowned out) to counter the rise of Vegan. Whilst it is important to respect peoples choice and ethics, it's a 2 way street. And there is plenty of mud slinging on both sides of this discussion. Reduction in meat consumption cannot be a bad thing but it needs to be thought about with the emotion removed. Logic and fact based decisions are more beneficial to us and the planet. Such a pity that both are all too often forgotten in the heat of emotion based discussion and decision making.
Then we get in the the potential conspiracies, one I have heard is that the rise Veganism is fuelled by the desire for certain businesses in the processed vegan food arena to make bigger profits by disseminating untruths and distorted facts. And yes, the same can be said for the meat industry.
The brilliant suggestions made above, bar code free etc, should also be reinforced with Seasonal eating and a varied diet with multiple colours (Eat A Rainbow).
Brian Steere http://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk/
08 January 2020 at 11:05 pm
Yes - please cut the false linkage between top down vegan virtue signalling and saving the planet.
I'm currently half way through F. William Engdahl's "Seeds of Destruction". While it will eventually get to GMO it provides background as to the US/(UK) Cartel of CorpGov's decision to make control of food (and its withholding) a primary weapon agenda - part of this is also the same groups active setting up and funding of eugenics - that continues by stealth and by language of deceit. It is the geopolitical agenda that is now known as globalism - and is weaponising Climate change, carbon guilting and demonisation, and the framing of FREE CHOICE to enact self degradation and catastrophic contraction in return for incentivised virtue signalling.
All from the folks who also brought us 'Rockefeller medicine'.
Those seeking power for themselves never have enough control ;
“The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it.”
― H.L. Mencken, Minority Report
So by all mean align in the diet of your joy and discernment - if you value joy in life and the capacity to discern it!
But be aware that there is a war against Consciousness - and that is you. It weaponises information by subtly framing narrative assertions and associations that effectively manipulate the unwary - and anyone who watches their own thought soon realises how unwary they actually are.
There is a systemic context or background to malnutrition and sickness by design, that has roots in monopolistic practices of induced or projected scarcities but has grown to global proportions.
Control of money supply - like control of energy, can leverage nations, and set regulations, that effectively transfer our lives to corporate ownership.
I'm not against corporate endeavour as such - but the law is rigged to set it as a destructive, asset stripping force, protected against its own toxic consequence and increasingly enabled by law to outsource such toxic debt to a population that is sold lies.
Heather Rosa www.ion.ac.uk
09 January 2020 at 7:33 am
thank you for cutting through the nonsense (non-science).
Alwyne
09 January 2020 at 9:04 am
At last some commonsense amidst all the fear mongering hype that is around at the moment.
Vanessa
09 January 2020 at 2:32 pm
Great article, alongside Dr Zoë Harcombe's one, discussing the potential health issues with longer-term veganism: https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2020/01/is-veganuary-healthy/
I may be considered a huge conspiracy theorist when I say that perhaps the push for veganism is likely to be part of a drive to lower the health and intellect of the developed world, resulting in people who are easily manipulated...and also more profit for Big Pharma!!
Anna Hookins
10 January 2020 at 6:12 pm
Guess who big pharma benefit most from... heart disease and diabetic patients. Guess what dramatically decreases your risk of getting those diseases? A whole foods, plant based diet.
Anna Hookins
10 January 2020 at 6:10 pm
I’m disappointed to read this. This is a very cherry picked article. To give some balance...
- yes I’m sure a few farms can be more environmentally friendly but this is not sustainable on a mass scale...this is why most farms in the U.K. are factory farms. There isn’t enough land for all animals to be raised on grass and it would be far too expensive for all animal flesh to be produced in this way. Around 70% of cows are factory farmed and it’s 90/95% of pigs and chickens.
- grass fed animals are actually MORE inefficient in terms of emissions. They are grown more slowly, consume more food, water, produce more waste matter and emit more methane (which is around 86 times as harmful as co2.). So if you want to be more environmentally friendly you’re better off eating factory farmed animals.
-it’s perfectly possible to have nutrient rich soil without animal manure...it’s called veganic farming.
- the vegan diet is not inherently nutritionally deficient. The academy of nutrition and dietetics have said the vegan diet is healthy for all stages of life. In fact meat eaters and vegans alike are prone to b12 deficiency so it’s recommend we all take an additional supplement. Animals are fed B12 enriching feed so often the only reason you get b12 is filtered through the body of the animal.
-buying local is a myth...if you’re serious about making changes for the environment then even local meat is more harmful than plants flown from further away. Meat and dairy are just terrible for the environment.
I hope you will consider these facts and be more responsible in your research and writing in future.
R . Atkinson
15 January 2020 at 2:53 pm
Oh dear . No mid-ground there then . Surely the problem is too many Homo sapiens. 8 Billion at the moment .forcecast 9 billion in 20 years . No incentives to reduce birth rate with the possible exception of China. Until we control our expanding population we will not be in control of anything else. Our economic and financial system relies on and needs expansion of population to encourage Increased GDPs , stock market values and ,increased low quality food production.
The soil association predicts much of our overworked soil will begin to be unproductive in 5 years because it is not receiving organic matter only man made fertilisers . Yes I know ,many crops are fed to animals. Where does the organic matter come from to fertilise the crops needed to sustain a vegan society .. Let me guess ,it comes from the crops we grow to grow the crops. We are in a hole aren’t we.
Rachel Boon www.rachelboon.co.uk
29 January 2020 at 11:29 am
Bit disappointed in this totally one-sided, over simplified article from the ANH. The vegan stance is complex and multi-faceted, as people are often vegan for the animals, and for the planet in addition to the proven health benefits. If you are simply avoiding animal products for health reasons, I would call this plant-based.
You mention that Scotland and Australia have achieved/nearly achieved carbon neutral farming-but these are land greedy practices and not necessarily transferable to most of densely populated Western Europe where we live. Also, you conveniently leave out the humane issue: organic animals still don't want to be killed way before the end of their natural lifespan and mother cows still con't want to be separated from their young. Baby male chicks don't want to be put through the mincer at a few days old as they can't lay eggs (so not financially viable) nor do male dairy calves want to separated from their mothers and reared in a confined environment only to be slaughtered between 6 and 12 months later for the rose and white veal industry. These are vegan issues, not plant-based ones.
To say that you can't grow crops properly without manure is ridiculous. There are organisations in every country set up to promote and achieve exactly this. Here is one in the UK alone: https://veganorganic.net/ a group promoting stock-free farming where food is grown in an organic way using just plant based fertilizers, encouraging functional biodiversity so pesticides/chemicals/ GMOs or animal by-products are not necessary in any part of the chain.
Similarly, if you are going to cherry pick data, you're going to have to do a lot better than a 31 year old paper (!) detailing experiments on rats to put people off legumes. Quoting vivisection in today's day and age? Surely you can find a more convincing/up to date/clinically relevant paper than that?
Finally, I wish will all the non-vegans would stop banging on about lab-grown meat as if that is a) essential to a vegan/plant-based diet b) a something vegans eat daily. Whilst 'fake meats' / Quorn (also grown in a petri dish) might be a useful transition food for those new to veganism/plant-based eating, I know very few long-term vegans who eat this sort of processed material. I have been vegan for 22 years and never knowingly eaten Quorn/lab grown meats. Whole food plant-based, local, seasonal, organic where possible food with no bar codes or suffering will always get my vote.
Other than that, keep up the good work ANH. I admire and respect most of what you stand for and the campaigning you do on behalf of our profession, but I feel this article let the side down somewhat. Happy new year everyone. Hope you and your practices are thriving.
Vandana @ PEMF-devices https://pemf-devices.com
11 February 2020 at 12:24 pm
Some great info there! Some really fit neuroscientists and fitness experts also recommend red meat in diet including for moms. It all depends on you! Immediately jumping to supplements might not be needed if you're switching from meat to non-meat but your ancestors were non-meat, so bottom line.. :)
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences