Children are not just the most precious resource for their parents. As the future caretakers of our world, they are a priceless resource for us all. This is why the newest video in our Right to kNOw campaign series is entirely dedicated to children. Alongside the information and links below, it contains essential information that every parent and caregiver needs to know now. The pressure to start vaccinating children with experimental mRNA covid vaccines is ratcheting up by the day.

Informed consent is only possible when a parent is given sufficient information to weigh up potential risks alongside potential benefits. ‘Potential’ being the operative word as these vaccines are still experimental and there are still so many unknown factors.

“Kids are one third of our population and all of our future. Kids are never the experiment. Protect the Children.”

- America’s Frontline Doctors

Watch our latest video

Note: You will see an advertising banner beneath our videos that play off the Brighteon platform (when they are not maximised). This advertising helps support the Brighteon platform that doesn't charge subscribers for their content, is committed to free speech, yet is also respectful of copyright-related law. We'd like to clarify that no advertising revenue from Brighteon is received by the Alliance for Natural Health Intl.

>>> Click here if you'd like to read a comprehensive 3,000 word article in which our founder, Rob Verkerk PhD, explains his reasons why he will not be consenting to the administration of covid vaccines for his youngest daughter.

Other expert voices join with ANH’s

Thankfully, ours is not the only voice speaking out for the children.

In Alabama, US, America’s Frontline Doctors have filed a petition for a temporary restraining order seeking temporary injunctive relief against any existing or further authorisation for use of covid vaccines in children under the age of 16.

On 6th May 2021, the Texas Senate Hearing heard from experts supporting the anti-discrimination bill (Senate Bill 1669), which, broadly, seeks to prohibit discrimination based on vaccination status. The whole session is 47:22 minutes which we recommend is very worth your time. If you’re short on time, particularly pertinent to the subject this week is the testimony from pediatrician, Dr Angelina Farella, who makes a very strong case for steering well clear of covid vaccines in children. You can find her testimony from 36:37 to 42:22 in the recording, but we’ve also clipped it below:

Source: Dr Angelina Farella’s testimony to the Texas State Senate, May 6^th 2021.

Are you a parent in the UK?

If you are a parent in the UK, you’d be right to be feeling like it’s 10 mins to midnight. Having heard Health Secretary Matt Hancock’s assurances in early December 2020 that children would not be part of the vaccination programme, as recent as yesterday, chief medical officer, Chris Witty, was threatening that children may not be able to continue their education in the fall without a covid vaccine.

We urge you to become as informed as you can. Here are some related links worthy of your time:

Independent organisation HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) article: COVID-19 child vaccination: irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary

BMJ Viewpoint Article: Should children be vaccinated against COVID-19 now?

Article in The BMJ Opinion: Covid vaccines for children should not get emergency use authorization

Open letter to the UK Government from UK-based Us For Them:

Open letter to the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) from UK Medical Freedom Alliance

Listen to Prof Callum Semple speaking on the Today Programme about why we should not be vaccinating children (listen from 1:22 - 1:25. You will need a BBC account to listen)

Video transcript  

Many of us parents are at the cusp of making one of the most important decisions on behalf of our children.

Intense, tightly controlled PR being rolled out through the world’s media has focused on making people feel it’s their duty to be vaccinated, while those who choose not to be vaccinated are branded as selfish.

There are still so few data on the safety of these novel and experimental covid vaccines for children. Importantly - whatever the media machines are trying to claim, there’s almost no serious risk posed by SARS-CoV-2 to healthy children - less than being struck by a bolt of lighting kind of risk. Add to this the unknown effectiveness of the existing vaccines against new variants of the virus, coupled with the extraordinary climate of censorship that makes accessing data by the average person even harder. This censorship is designed to silence and stifle any scientific or medical voices that don’t agree with the mainstream view. It’s simply absurd to stigmatise and marginalise parents with the label ‘anti-vaxxer’ for being understandably hesitant on behalf of their children.

Attacking individuals is no substitute for an open discussion of the science – something that’s viewed as off-limits in the mainstream media.   

Be aware that the PR machine is in full swing now, putting kids in an increasingly impossible position. It’s making them feel they need to put their duty to protect others ahead of their parent’s views. Apart from being based on very limited and sketchy data, this is too much guilt and responsibility to lay on a child’s shoulders. These kinds of tensions in a young child’s mind create trauma which could reverberate over a lifetime.

As I’ve already alluded, the hard risk/benefit data for the different covid vaccines being offered to children is very limited. But the data pattern that’s beginning to emerge suggests that in younger people and children, the risks of vaccination outweigh the benefits.

This has been shown recently in Italy with a risk/benefit study of people under 60 vaccinated with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. The results showed that for the youngest group for which data were available, those aged 20 to 29, the risks outweighed the benefits.

Ethical principles as they relate to medical studies - a field referred to as ‘bioethics’ – has underpinned drug development and testing since the Nuremberg trials after the Second World War. Over the last 15 months, these bioethical principles have been completely cast aside to allow for the use of experimental, synthetic biology and mRNA-based vaccines on children.

Bioethical concerns have also been expressed by a leading US cardiologist, Dr Peter McCullough, one of the world’s most prominent and vocal advocates for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection to prevent hospitalisation and death.

Because of controlled script offered by the mainstream media, many parents are not yet aware that some governments - Canada and the UK included - are trying to banish the requirement for our consent as parents. In Canada, vaccine centres are offering kids ice creams while children are jabbed and protesting parents are held behind police lines.

In England and Wales, ‘Gillick competence’, is being used to get round the need for parental consent. This legal precedent allows a child to override a parent’s decision and give their own consent to medical treatment, which can be done without their parents’ knowledge. Gillick competence itself stems from a case about an adolescent girl who was prescribed the contraceptive pill without her parents’ knowledge - and it’s astounding that this precedent can now be applied to experimental medicines about which so little is known - not even by most adults.   

You might also want to hear what another eminent scientist, Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology for gene therapy and vaccines had to say about bioethics in a recent interview with evolutionary biologist Brett Weinstein on his Darkhorse Podcast.

Like many of us, the three top scientists, Robert Malone, Brett Weinstein and Steve Kirsch – the latter from Trial Site News, who debated the issue for over 3 hours on Dr Weinstein’s podcast are more worried about long-term, systemic complications from vaccines, not the short-term adverse reactions. That includes concerns about inducing autoimmune conditions as well as antibody-dependent enhancement or ADE – the severe reaction of the immune system that can happen when someone once exposed is exposed subsequently either to the vaccine or the wild virus. All of these kinds of effects can only be determined when years, not weeks, or a few months have elapsed. 

We now know something that the regulators have known well before the vaccines were rolled out. That mRNA vaccines move beyond the site of injection and get into the circulation, accumulating in organs, such as the liver, spleen and ovaries. This knowledge changes everything. As do the data that show that the spike protein itself is far from the innocuous, immune system signal we were once led to believe. As the Salk Institute’s found, the spike protein, whether from the virus itself, delivered in the vaccines or produced by human cells in the case of mRNA vaccines, is toxic to cells and tissues in its own right. It’s the spike protein that does a lot of the vascular damage found in severe covid disease.  

Put simply: This decision is not an easy one. It’s not one that anyone should feel coerced to make on behalf of the world’s most valuable resource – our children. The reality is that huge uncertainty abounds and it is disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

We all have a right to know what is and isn’t known about these experimental vaccines and every parent has a right to choose to be ‘better safe than sorry’ — a maxim that’s also encompassed in the precautionary principle.

Whatever your decision, let it be informed and respected. Who knows, facing the scorn and drip-feed from a multi-billion dollar PR campaign for the vaccine industry may be a small price to pay for the future of your children’s health and the future of our species.

Read more about covid vaccines in our Covid Zone

Return to homepage