'Homeopathy and the New Fundamentalism: A Critique of the Critics' published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol 14, Number 5, 2008 , pp 589-594
Download (84 KB)Press release following the release of three papers in a single edition of the peer reviewed journal, Archives of Internal Medicine, all of which support high dose supplementation.
Download (479 KB)ANH's one page A4 flyer. Download it and distribute it!!
Download (487 KB)In the wake of the Neuhouser et al observational study (Archives of Internal Medicine, Feb 9; 169(3): 294-304) evaluating the effects of multivitamins and minerals on postmenopausal women, the ANH calls for better spending of public money in the area of preventative healthcare.
Download (873 KB)Globalna kontrola ywnoci przez rzdy i koncerny midzynarodowe
Download (404 KB)The ANH critique of Neuhouser et al's paper: "Multivitamin Use and Risk of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease in the Women's Health Initiative Cohorts"Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 9; 169(3): 294-304. The study investigated the effects of multivitamin and mineral supplements on chronic diseases and the ANH shows why the negative results were entirely expected.
Download (484 KB)The February 2009 call to Canadian natural health consumers and industry to come together to challenge Bill-C6, which could adversely impact thousands of natural health products presently upon the Canadian market, as well as, potentially, the practice of natural medicine, including herbal and orthomolecular medicine.
Download (50 KB)Press release from the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service regarding the pharma biases in journals.
Download (81 KB)The ANH open letter was stimulated following EFSA's dismissive response to ANH and Professor Vyvyan Howard's critical commentaries on the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) over the use of sodium monofluorophosphate in food supplements.
Download (2 MB)ANH release on 26th January 2009, calling for an independent inquiry into EFSA's risk assessment work, on the day ANH released its own critique and another independent commentary by Prof Vyvyan Howard. Both these critiques are referenced in the Notes to the Editor section of the release.
Download (474 KB)This site uses cookies and other tracking technologies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our products and services, and provide content from third parties.