Working around censorship

If we had more time I’d rant a whole lot more than I’m about to. The trouble is we live in a 140-character reality. Sound bites are king. Short is better than long. Binary is better than complex.

But all of the issues we deal with in the area of natural health are complex. They don’t have obvious answers, despite what governments and big business try to tell us. With enough relevant information on hand, some of the issues – such as working out the best diet for a given individual at a particular time – can be resolved, albeit not easily, through a complicated process.

Based on the need for short: I urge you to read my appeal based on Facebook’s decision to censor us. Governments and businesses — both of which are increasingly dependent on social media as a means of communicating with the public — have set the agenda. Our issues aren’t part of that agenda and that appears to be why we don’t get the same privileges as Monsanto, Walmart, Tesco or Microsoft.

Discover in our second piece about a new and potent campaign for real food with which we and other leaders in the fields of sustainable farming and healthcare in the UK were intimately involved this last weekend in the UK’s west country. And – thinking globally – check out what’s been happening in natural health news around the world. Our top concern is a new rat study showing deeply disturbing and magnified health effects of glyphosate exposure on subsequent generations. 

We implore you to engage with our ‘asks’ in our lead piece about Facebook censorship. We really need your help – and thank you in advance.

In health naturally – and sustainably