Content Sections
By Rob Verkerk PhD
Executive and scientific director, ANH-Intl
This week, we bring our readership two stories that were due to be published in the Hugffington Post. Each is written by a highly acclaimed health journalist, Sally Beck and Jerome Burne, respectively. Each has been refused publication at the 11th hour. Last week, I found myself in a similar situation after being, minutes before going to air, knocked off the BBC Radio 2 Jeremy Vine programme to contest the views of Oxford-based physicist and skeptic, David Robert Grimes PhD.
Jerome Burne's article very briefly appeared on the site of the American version of the Huffington Post yesterday, but was rapidly taken down and replaced with a message saying that the article was no longer available on the site. It was scheduled to run with a detailed article on the film Vaxxed by Sally Beck, a regular columnist for the Post. That too was rapidly removed. No reason has been given.
The last 7 days
This last week, The Times newspaper in London bombarded British readers with 5 articles condemning Andrew Wakefield and anyone who might have concerns over vaccine safety, especially where it concerns any association between vaccines and autism. On one of these articles, last Thursday, our executive coordinator, Meleni Aldridge, made it onto the front pages given that The Times had pulled a photograph from our website with her positioned next to the heavily maligned Wakefield.
We asked our friend, ANH co-founder and PR consultant, Adrian Shaw, what he thought about this. His response was as follows: “I have been practising national media relations for over thirty years and to see five articles covering the same single health story in a one national newspaper over a three day period is virtually unprecedented in my experience. It’s as rare as hen’s teeth for this to happen and bids a fundamental question; WHY?”
Murdoch and Brian Deer is have got to be two of the reasons. Many will remember that James Murdoch was a non-exec on the board of GSK until 2012. GSK is the world’s second largest drug company and one of the world’s largest vaccine producers.
The company produces an eye-watering 1.9 million vaccines for global distribution every day. The Times and Sunday Times newspapers are owned by Murdoch’s News International and in 2010, Brian Deer found himself readily available as a journalist for these papers to do his darndest to bring down Wakefield, the figurehead for concerns over the MMR vaccine link.
When the science is uncertain, News International had presumably deduced that you get more points by taking down the messenger than tackling the extraordinarily complex relationship between a poorly understood, although very common, condition that is affected by a multitude of environmental and genetic variables among a very diverse pool of individuals. As history tells us, Deer did in fact succeed, at least partially. But he didn’t stop Wakefield’s crusade to understand more about the triggers for the ever-increasing autism epidemic that is set to paralyse society as we know it in the years ahead if the incidence rate is not curbed.
‘Sheeple’ beware
The media wants the public to accept facts provided to it by the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry, described by leading Danish researcher, Peter Gotzche, as “organised crime”.
On the other side of the debate are people claiming all vaccines cause health problems in all people. In our estimation, the data are simply not there to allow such a sweeping conclusion to be drawn.
However, the majority of people who have concerns about vaccines do not resort to such extreme positions. The pharmaceutical and vaccine industry has delegated responsibility to governments so that it avoids liability for injury. Governments and the vaccine makers profit from selling vaccines – and in self-interest, governments do not want to be liable for paying out compensation to vaccine damaged children. This situation will only change when the evidence for vaccine risk is undisputable, the very situation the tobacco industry found itself in after 30 years of scientific research and debate. We must understand that given the current degree of control of research and information, we may never find ourselves in this position with vaccines – and not because there are no causal relationships to be found. Instead, it may be simply because such relationships are extremely difficult to tease out of an incredibly complex system with so many variables.
The extraordinary situation we find ourselves in with vaccines relates to the degree of control of information and censorship.
Sally Beck’s piece is one of very few about the central issue within Vaxxed itself; the cover-up in the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Jerome Burne’s piece proposes that we maintain a considerably more open mind than most media and their paymasters would wish of us.
The two articles that were pulled from the Huffington Post (US Edition) yesterday.
Way forward
We say that the two contrasting positions, that vaccines are ‘absolutely safe’ and vaccines are ‘always dangerous’, are as untenable as each other given the current state of scientific knowledge. We support Robert Kennedy Jnr and Robert De Niro’s open letter to journalists announcing their World Mercury Project.
We are proposing initially that you, our readers and supporters, consider the following:
- Keep an open mind.
- Dismiss outright government and health authorities’ statements that vaccines are safe when in fact there is copious evidence for lack of safety, supported by the US$3.5 billion payout by the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) since 1988
- Be mindful of the quality and sources of scientific data, as well as conclusions drawn. This will include ensuring that comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations (where such data exist) are valid, that purported evidence of excessive incidence of autism (where relevant) is compared with background incidence (among unvaccinated populations).
- Ascertain when the media, a scientist, doctor or anyone else, is claiming an association as against causation. The two have different implications, the latter being something of a slam dunk, the former usually being inconclusive from an evidential standpoint. The two are built from very different types of data – and causation in complex health conditions can be very difficult indeed to verify. Lack of evidence of causation should not ever be assumed to equate to evidence for no causal relationship, a very common error made by media and pro-vaccine scientists alike.
- Recognise that highly suggestive evidence based on association, rather than causation, may be the best available evidence. In cases of such uncertainty, where serious risk to public health is plausible, an approach that takes into account the precautionary principle should be employed. If this should point to a problem with a particular vaccine in a particular age group, gender or other group of children, it is both unacceptable and unethical to propose that the absence of vaccination should involve no additional actions or advice. Health professionals should be encouraged to offer alternate advice and guidance to allow parents or guardians opportunities, using scientifically supported approaches, to improve the resilience of their children’s immune systems.
Next week, we will lay bare the key elements of existing evidence on vaccine safety. Please circulate this widely and encourage your friends and contacts to sign-up to our eAlert free of charge from our homepage.
Read Sally Beck’s story - Vaxxed: Why we should be allowed to watch this movie
Read Jerome Burne’s story – The MMR vaccine: Why it is sensible to worry about the way it is regulated
Comments
your voice counts
23 February 2017 at 9:09 am
Thank you for keeping this on our collective agendas. Part of the problem is, I think, that parents of children who are vaccinated and do not get autism then become naysayers to the idea of the connection, rather than they just got lucky.
23 February 2017 at 4:21 pm
Thanks for taking the time to comment on Ginny. You may well be correct unfortunately. This is such an important topic and one we are going to keep at the top of our agenda.
Warm Regards
Melissa
24 February 2017 at 12:13 am
Vaccination is regarded as 'settled science' - that is - of science as a top down directive.
But as consciousness grows more aware - the attempts to deny, limit and control the change that inevitably reflects a changed perspective, become ever more dissociated and dictatorial.
Sovereignty is the core issue. Live it - or give it up to state mandate. Fear slaves who believe they are empowered and protected? Strong words But why pretend not to know and withhold true witness so as not to seem dissonant to a normalcy of such terrible dissonance that simple honesty may as well be an alien tongue!
It is clear that vaccination, the medical model and the general scientific establishment in corporate ownership, is a religion - but not in the sense of a free holy will to be discovered as the movement of Life through us - but rather the enforcement of power over life via deceit and coercion. That is the disease that generates fear and division while a blind elitist gets private gratification.
Science is a willingness to trust and follow the movement of desire and curiosity that challenges a current ignorance - even if it seems like reality. What masks as science today is increasingly revealing itself as anti-science - in fact the mask itself is becoming more obvious in every field of human endeavour.
Outrage needs to be channelled to a deeper alignment in self-honesty. Our own 'reality' needs challenging in the same wise as that of so called regulatory bodies, or healthcare professionals. It is not that people are bad so much as 'captured' and compromised' by their own thinking - regardless what the conditions are - we interpret and respond though our own consciousness.
Mandatory vax is 'medical rape'. Like any other field of fake reality - the more one breaks the official line by being willing to truly look into it, the more it is revealed as an identity/reality issue first and foremost - to which the suffering and loss of life is considered a side-show or collateral by which to set up further extensions of a theatre of operations.
But of course the tragic fact is - we do it unto our selves. In indirect ways and in ignorance of knowing what we do.
Re-establishing a truly felt connected consciousness is health and abiding in that is an integrative transformation such as to then embody that witness as a quality of being in whoever we are and whatever we do. Fear of conflict allows the bully to set up shop. But unconflicted being is the freedom to not buy it.
Awakening responsibility is freedom - not blame. As someone is often quoted - 'Everything is backwards'. But that is exactly the 'reality' to challenge and bring curiosity in desire for truth, fully present.
24 February 2017 at 6:10 pm
In the healthcare industry, patients have traditionally been fully informed of the risks of any pharmaceutical drug, as shown in their commercials on the TV and radio. So it has always puzzled me that vaccines, which are essentially a drug treatment to affect a prevention of a condition, are given a pass and asserted to be completely safe. No medical treatment in the history of the world has been without risks.
In recent decades vaccines are given increasingly to people to purportedly help them, but patients aren't fully informed of the fact that a portion of the population, no matter what the alleged percentage is, react negatively to them. And patients are intimidated to question their doctor closely or to say no, and the result is an injured child.
This is what the real tyranny is, as no one knows how a child who has never been vaccinated will react to the shot. I reacted very badly to my first round of shots when I was a toddler many years ago, and our family doctor warned my mother never to have me vaccinated again. That was back in the days when doctors were more independent and ascribed to the oath "first, do no harm". She broke that only once when I was given the polio vaccination because she had a dear friend who lived for years in an iron lung after she came down with polio. Fortunately for me I handled the shot fairly well.
27 February 2017 at 10:16 am
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Leigh
Kind regards
Miranda
24 February 2017 at 7:41 pm
"and to see five articles covering the same single health story in a one national newspaper over a three day period is virtually unprecedented in my experience. It’s as rare as hen’s teeth for this to happen and bids a fundamental question; WHY?”
Pretty obvious as to why
Its whats going on in the USA with Wakefield having appeared at Trump's inaugoration ball and being adviser to Robert Kennedy's proposed vaccine safety commission. Another reason the MSM hate Trump
28 September 2019 at 4:42 pm
Has anyone here met a mother whose child has died because of measles complications? or left with lifelong effects? I have. The problem with modern society is that we have forgotten what childhood was like before there were vaccinations.
Not every child can have vaccinations - there are those who are already immuno-compromised who rightly are advised not to be vaccinated. They rely on herd immunity to prevent the spread of preventable diseases. Every mother who chooses not to vaccinate their child should consider the risk they are posing to children already suffering
Your voice counts
We welcome your comments and are very interested in your point of view, but we ask that you keep them relevant to the article, that they be civil and without commercial links. All comments are moderated prior to being published. We reserve the right to edit or not publish comments that we consider abusive or offensive.
There is extra content here from a third party provider. You will be unable to see this content unless you agree to allow Content Cookies. Cookie Preferences